CVE-2026-10669

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 93% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

On Xtensa SoCs built with CONFIG_XTENSA_MPU and CONFIG_USERSPACE, arch_buffer_validate() in arch/xtensa/core/mpu.c — the architecture hook that verifies a user-mode-supplied buffer is accessible to the calling user thread with the requested permission — defaulted its return value to 0 (access permitted) and only set a denial result inside its per-MPU-region probe loop. When the rounded extent of the buffer wraps the 32-bit address space (size + alignment offset near SIZE_MAX, or ROUND_UP(size + offset) overflowing to 0), the loop executes zero iterations and the function returns 0 = permitted without probing any MPU region.

The syscall-layer pre-checks (K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_SIZE_CHECK / Z_DETECT_POINTER_OVERFLOW) only catch a raw addr+size wrap and do not cover the ROUND_UP-induced wrap, and the string path (arch_user_string_nlen -> arch_buffer_validate) has no syscall-layer guard at all.

An unprivileged user-mode thread can therefore pass a crafted (addr, size) to any syscall that validates user buffers via k_usermode_from_copy/to_copy or k_usermode_string_copy and have validation succeed for memory it must not access; the kernel then reads from (disclosure) or, with write=1, writes to (corruption) attacker-chosen kernel or other-partition memory on the thread's behalf, enabling information disclosure, memory corruption, privilege escalation, and denial of service.

Affected from v3.7.0 (when Xtensa MPU userspace support was added) through v4.4.0. The fix changes the default to -EINVAL (deny by default), adds an explicit size_add_overflow check, and sets the success value only after the full range has been validated.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 14, 2026

Last Modified

August 6, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 14, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available

Xtensa MPU arch_buffer_validate() integer-overflow lets a user thread bypass syscall pointer validation · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-4r4p-gh69-v6w4
github_commit

commit 3b1bdaf54821 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 3b1bdaf54821 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/3b1bdaf5482188ca110ef9a411aaa8c7d3db3b16

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-28 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-26 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-24 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-23 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-22 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-20 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-18 22:18 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-16 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 08:37 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-15 10:39 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-14 01:42 UTCEG score recompute
Show 43 more
  1. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-12 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-11 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-09 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-09 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-08 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-06 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-06 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-04 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-03 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-02 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-01 10:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-31 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-30 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-07-30 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-28 18:55 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-26 11:47 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-23 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-14 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-07-14 15:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-10669?
CVE-2026-10669 is a high vulnerability published on July 14, 2026. On Xtensa SoCs built with CONFIGXTENSAMPU and CONFIGUSERSPACE, archbuffervalidate() in arch/xtensa/core/mpu.c — the architecture hook that verifies a user-mode-supplied buffer is accessible to the calling user thread with the requested permission — defaulted its return value to 0 (access permitted)…
When was CVE-2026-10669 disclosed?
CVE-2026-10669 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 14, 2026, with the most recent update on August 6, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-10669 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-10669 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10669?
CVE-2026-10669 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10669?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-10669, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10669

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10669?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.