CVE-2026-10643

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 98% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Zephyr's IP socket recvmsg() implementation (subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_inet.c, insert_pktinfo()) validated the user-supplied ancillary (msg_control) buffer using only the payload length (msg->msg_controllen < pktinfo_len) before writing a full control message consisting of an aligned cmsg header plus the payload. Because the check omitted the cmsg header size, a control buffer whose length falls in the under-checked window (e.g. 16-27 bytes for IPv4 IP_PKTINFO on a 64-bit target, where a single element actually occupies 28 bytes) passes the guard yet causes a fixed-size out-of-bounds write of up to one cmsg header (~12 bytes) past the end of the buffer.

Under CONFIG_USERSPACE the recvmsg verifier allocates a kernel-heap copy of the control buffer sized to msg_controllen and runs the implementation against it, so the overflow corrupts kernel heap memory and is triggerable from an unprivileged userspace thread; in supervisor mode it corrupts the caller's buffer.

The path is reachable on a UDP/IP socket with IP_PKTINFO/IPV6_RECVPKTINFO (or hoplimit/timestamping) enabled when the application calls recvmsg() with an undersized control buffer and a datagram is received; part of the overwritten bytes (the destination IP in ipi_addr) is influenced by the received packet.

The fix makes the capacity check use NET_CMSG_SPACE(pktinfo_len) (aligned header + aligned data) and returns -ENOMEM when the buffer is too small. Affected: v3.6.0 through v4.4.0.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EPSS
2.4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 27, 2026

Last Modified

July 14, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jun 27, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 01fe77b2ec38 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 01fe77b2ec38 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/01fe77b2ec3885583f709a17c5203ce02bd77012

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-10643?
CVE-2026-10643 is a high vulnerability published on June 27, 2026. Zephyr's IP socket recvmsg() implementation (subsys/net/lib/sockets/socketsinet.c, insertpktinfo()) validated the user-supplied ancillary (msgcontrol) buffer using only the payload length (msg->msgcontrollen < pktinfolen) before writing a full control message consisting of an aligned cmsg header…
When was CVE-2026-10643 disclosed?
CVE-2026-10643 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 27, 2026, with the most recent update on July 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-10643 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-10643 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.4% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10643?
CVE-2026-10643 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10643?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-10643, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10643

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10643?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.