CVE-2026-102720

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A DHCP server, or anyone on the LAN who answers a DISCOVER first, can make the client read about a

kilobyte past the end of the received message.

The option walk keeps a pointer and an offset in step, and the only bound check uses the offset:

/* addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7538, 7572 */

while (i < length - 1)

{

... size = *(++data); /* data moves 1: type -> length byte */ data += size + 1; /* data moves size + 1 more */ i += size + 1; /* i moves only size + 1 */

}

A TLV option occupies size + 2 bytes. data is advanced by size + 2 in total, i by size + 1, so

the offset falls one byte behind the real read position for every option the walk skips. After

enough skipped options the check i < length - 1 still holds while data is already past the end

of the message, and the subsequent read of the type and length bytes comes from whatever follows.

A single OFFER carrying a long run of skippable options is enough:

ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow

READ of size 1 at 0x61b000000794 thread T5

#0 _nx_dhcp_search_buffer addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7541 #1 _nx_dhcp_get_option_value addons/dhcp/nxd_dhcp_client.c:7082

0x61b000000794 is located 164 bytes to the right of 1648-byte region

A well formed OFFER through the same path is handled normally, the client records the offer and

moves to REQUESTING, so the difference is the option layout rather than the harness.

The read runs in the DHCP client thread while the client is still unconfigured, so it happens on

every boot in reach of a hostile DHCP responder. The values read are used to configure the

interface, which is how the disclosed bytes become observable.

Advance i by size + 2, or derive the bound from data rather than keeping a second counter.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
24
EG Risk 24/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity53% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-102720(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 09:40 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-04 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-03 11:40 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-03 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-02 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-02 13:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-30 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-30 17:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-29 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-29 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-29 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-29 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-29 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-29 17:48 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-102720?
CVE-2026-102720 is a medium vulnerability published on September 29, 2026. A DHCP server, or anyone on the LAN who answers a DISCOVER first, can make the client read about a kilobyte past the end of the received message. The option walk keeps a pointer and an offset in step, and the only bound check uses the offset: A TLV option occupies size + 2 bytes. data is advanced…
When was CVE-2026-102720 disclosed?
CVE-2026-102720 was first published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-102720 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-102720 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102720?
CVE-2026-102720 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102720?
No fix for CVE-2026-102720 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-102720 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102720

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102720?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.