CVE-2026-102713

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than

four bytes (nxd_tftp_server.c:1037) and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not

against the protocol maximum of 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX. Two things follow from that one

missing check, both reachable before any authentication because TFTP has none.

The handler passes nx_packet_length - 4 straight to FileX:

/* addons/tftp/nxd_tftp_server.c:1863, 1889 */

status = nx_packet_copy(packet_ptr, &temp_ptr,

server_ptr -> nx_tftp_server_packet_pool_ptr, NX_WAIT_FOREVER);

...

fx_file_write(&(client_request_ptr -> nx_tftp_client_request_file),

packet_ptr -> nx_packet_prepend_ptr + 4, packet_ptr -> nx_packet_length - 4);

nx_packet_length is the length of a chain, not of one contiguous buffer, so FileX copies past the

end of the first packet:

ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow

READ of size 1280 at 0x621000001108 thread T5

#0 __interceptor_memcpy #1 _fx_utility_memory_copy filex/common/src/fx_utility_memory_copy.c:78

0x621000001108 is 0 bytes to the right of 4104-byte region

Those bytes are written into the file the attacker is uploading, and a TFTP read request hands them

back, so this is a memory disclosure with a convenient retrieval channel.

The same datagram also wedges the server. nx_packet_copy at :1863 needs

ceil(nx_packet_length / pool_payload) packets and asks for them with NX_WAIT_FOREVER, so when the

attacker sizes the datagram beyond what the pool holds, the server thread suspends and never

returns. A liveness probe after one such datagram times out with the pool at 0 of 12 packets and

the server thread suspended, and no later client is served.

Reject nx_packet_length > 4 + NX_TFTP_FILE_TRANSFER_MAX in the DATA branch before either call,

and use a bounded wait rather than NX_WAIT_FOREVER for the copy.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-102713(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-03 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-03 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-03 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-02 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-02 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-02 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-01 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-30 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-30 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-30 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-29 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-29 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-29 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-29 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 17:48 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-102713?
CVE-2026-102713 is a high vulnerability published on September 29, 2026. The TFTP server accepts a DATA datagram of any size. The dispatcher rejects datagrams shorter than four bytes (nxdtftpserver.c:1037) and nothing anywhere checks an upper bound, in particular not against the protocol maximum of 4 + NXTFTPFILETRANSFERMAX. Two things follow from that one missing…
When was CVE-2026-102713 disclosed?
CVE-2026-102713 was first published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-102713 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-102713 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102713?
CVE-2026-102713 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102713?
No fix for CVE-2026-102713 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-102713 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102713

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102713?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.