CVE-2026-102715

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Any host on the LAN can send two mDNS records and make the responder write past the end of its

transmit packet.

The string table stores each name in a slot rounded up to a multiple of four:

/* addons/mdns/nxd_mdns.c:11436, 11443, 11447 */

memory_len = ((memory_len & 0xFFFFFFFC) + 8) & 0xFFFFFFFF;

...

len = *((USHORT*)(p - 2)); /* slot size, not string length */

if ((len == memory_len) && ... _nx_mdns_name_match(start, memory_ptr, memory_size) ...)

The lookup that decides whether an incoming name is already stored compares the rounded slot size,

so names of 12, 13, 14 and 15 characters share one bucket. A second name in the bucket is answered

with the pointer to the first, and the record then carries a string up to three bytes longer than

the length the caller accounted for. _nx_mdns_packet_rr_add (nxd_mdns.c:8911) sizes its only

bound check from that stale length, and _nx_mdns_name_string_encode writes the real string.

Two PTR records are enough, both ordinary mDNS responses to a _http._tcp query, with owner names

whose lengths fall in the same bucket:

==87491==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow

WRITE of size 1 at 0x611000000124 thread T5

#0 _nx_mdns_name_string_encode addons/mdns/nxd_mdns.c:13096 #1 _nx_mdns_packet_rr_add addons/mdns/nxd_mdns.c:8911

0x611000000124 is 0 bytes to the right of 228-byte region

The overflow is one to three bytes of attacker-influenced name data past nx_packet_data_end. In a

normal pool that lands in the next packet in the same pool rather than in a redzone, so the visible

effect is a corrupted neighbouring packet or a corrupted pool free list rather than a clean crash.

Compare the slot size against the stored string length before declaring a match, or keep the

string length in the slot header and return it to the caller so the encoder and the bound check

agree.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-102715(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-03 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-03 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-03 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-02 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-02 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-02 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-01 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-30 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-30 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-30 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-29 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-29 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-29 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-29 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-29 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-29 17:48 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-102715?
CVE-2026-102715 is a high vulnerability published on September 29, 2026. Any host on the LAN can send two mDNS records and make the responder write past the end of its transmit packet. The string table stores each name in a slot rounded up to a multiple of four: The lookup that decides whether an incoming name is already stored compares the rounded slot size, so names…
When was CVE-2026-102715 disclosed?
CVE-2026-102715 was first published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-102715 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-102715 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-102715?
CVE-2026-102715 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-102715?
No fix for CVE-2026-102715 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-102715 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-102715

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-102715?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.