Kyverno before 1.19.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery. The default egress blocklist (169.254.169.254, 169.254.169.253, metadata.google.internal, 127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128) and the scoped-token control were wired only into the new CEL http.Get/Post library and were never applied to the legacy apiCall service executor (pkg/engine/apicall/executor.go) or to the GlobalContextEntry external-API path, which handle every non-CEL context[].apiCall.service call. Because these paths use a plain net/http client with no egress filtering and no validation of the configured service URL, a ClusterPolicy or GlobalContextEntry author — or, where a deployed policy templates the service URL from the admission resource, a lower-privileged resource submitter — can cause Kyverno to issue GET/POST requests to an arbitrary host, including the cloud metadata endpoint, loopback, and any in-cluster service, reading cloud instance credentials and reaching internal endpoints with Kyverno's network position. The executor also unconditionally attaches Kyverno's projected ServiceAccount token to the attacker-chosen destination; the token is audience-scoped, limiting its replay value. Fixed in 1.19.1.
CVE-2026-100705
Score 7.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.6; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity76% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 8th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Kyverno before 1.19.1 SSRF via legacy apiCall service executor | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/kyverno-before-1.19.1-ssrf-via-legacy-apicall-service-executorLegacy `apiCall` service executor and GlobalContextEntry bypass the SSRF blocklist / SA-token egress controls that were applied only to the CEL http path · Advisory · kyverno/kyverno · GitHub
https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/security/advisories/GHSA-q825-p383-r9v5Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100705(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 17:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
Show 14 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-29 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 21:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100705?
When was CVE-2026-100705 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100705 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100705?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100705?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100705
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100705?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.