Adminer 5.5.1 through 6.0.1 improperly parses the login 'server' string in the host_port() function in adminer/include/functions.inc.php. The port capture group requires pure digits anchored to the end of the string, so any server value with a non-digit tail fails the regex and falls back to returning the whole string as the host with an empty port. Because the privileged-port restriction in adminer/include/auth.inc.php inspects only the parsed port, the check is skipped, and the mysqli/mysqlnd client subsequently re-parses host:port from the host string and opens a TCP connection. A remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the Adminer login page can submit a crafted value such as 127.0.0.1:80/x to make the server initiate TCP connections to arbitrary internal hosts and privileged ports before credentials are validated, enabling server-side request forgery and blind internal port scanning (connection refused vs. handshake vs. timeout acts as a liveness oracle). This is a regression that re-opens the bypass fixed in 5.5.0 (GHSA-58cq-mgw2-38m5). Fixed in 6.0.2.
CVE-2026-100698
Score 5.8 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.8
- EG Score
- 5.8MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 57EG Risk 57/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity58% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Adminer before 6.0.2 Privileged-Port SSRF via host_port Regex | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/adminer-before-6.0.2-privileged-port-ssrf-via-host-port-regexPrivileged-port SSRF via host_port regex non-match · Advisory · vrana/adminer · GitHub
https://github.com/vrana/adminer/security/advisories/GHSA-rwxg-xph9-82cjVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100698(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| adminer | 5.2.1+dfsg-1 ... 6.0.1-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-05 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 12:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 7 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:14:adminer
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100698?
When was CVE-2026-100698 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100698 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100698?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100698?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-100698
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100698?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.