Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the group and account blueprints. The access map is gated by a security@: admin.super guard that is resolved by the field's exact path, so a submitted flat dot-notation key such as access.admin.super (instead of the nested access[admin][super]) matches no blueprint rule, survives BlueprintSchema::filterArray() and flattening, and is written by FlexObject::update() via setNestedProperty(), which splits on . and reconstructs the nested value. An authenticated backend operator using the flex accounts backend who holds admin.users but not admin.super can therefore grant admin.super to their own account or to a group they belong to and escalate to full super-admin, gaining control over configuration, plugin and theme installation, the file manager, and all accounts. Fixed in 2.0.25, which drops any dotted key whose ancestor path is disabled or marked validate.ignore.
CVE-2026-100670
Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 56EG Risk 56/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Grav CMS 2.0.14 through 2.0.24 Privilege Escalation via Blueprint Guard Bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/grav-cms-2.0.14-through-2.0.24-privilege-escalation-via-blueprint-guard-bypassGrav CMS group blueprint `security@` guard bypass via flat dot-notation key leads to privilege escalation · Advisory · getgrav/grav · GitHub
https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-mwjj-r7vm-pgqmVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100670(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 03:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 11 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100670?
When was CVE-2026-100670 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100670 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100670?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100670?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100670
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100670?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.