OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.7.1 incorrectly trusts requester provenance in message.action. In identity-bearing Gateway deployments (authentication modes that honor caller identity and narrower operator scopes), a write-scoped caller can supply another sender's identifier to the channel authorization checks and invoke a channel action under that spoofed requester identity, reaching operations the channel adapter would have denied to the real caller. Practical impact depends on the enabled channel, the action, and the target account's permissions. Shared-secret token and password callers are full trusted operators under OpenClaw's security model and are out of scope. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1; as a workaround, restrict message.action to administrators and disable sensitive channel actions that rely on requester identity.
CVE-2026-100579
Score 7.6 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.6; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.6
- EG Score
- 7.6HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 34EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity76% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via Spoofed Requester | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-before-2026.7.1-authentication-bypass-via-spoofed-requestermessage.action could trust spoofed requester provenance · Advisory · openclaw/openclaw · GitHub
https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-4wvr-f35r-f8w4Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100579(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 06:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 06:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 14 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 03:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 02:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100579?
When was CVE-2026-100579 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100579 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100579?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100579?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100579
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100579?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.