vLLM through 0.29.0 fetches and fully materializes remote or inline media before enforcing its documented media controls (the VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_CLIP_FILESIZE_MB compressed-audio size cap, default 25 MB, and the per-modality --limit-mm-per-prompt item limits). Across four ingress paths — the shared media-acquisition layer (HTTPConnection.get_bytes()/async_get_bytes()), the chat completions audio_url/base64 path, the batch speech runner, and the Rust frontend POST /tokenize route — the server reads the entire HTTP response body, base64-decodes the inline payload, or spawns one fetch/decode task per media part, and only then applies the limit (or, on some paths, never applies it). A remote attacker can therefore cause the API server or batch-runner process to allocate memory and consume outbound bandwidth proportional to an attacker-chosen body size or media item count before the request is rejected, resulting in pre-inference memory and bandwidth exhaustion (denial of service). The chat and batch surfaces require an API key when one is configured; the Rust frontend /tokenize route is unauthenticated by design. There is no code execution or data disclosure impact.
CVE-2026-100650
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-26. The CNA's CVSS baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 47th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
October 1, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026vLLM before 0.29.0 Resource Exhaustion via Unbounded Media Materialization | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vllm-before-0.29.0-resource-exhaustion-via-unbounded-media-materializationcommit 752a3a504485 (vllm-project/vllm)
Fix landed in vllm-project/vllm commit 752a3a504485 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/752a3a504485790a2e8491cacbb35c137339ad34Remote media is fetched and fully materialized before the documented media size / item limits are enforced — remote pre-inference memory and bandwidth exhaustion (4 sites) · Advisory · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-p6g9-7v3x-m8mvVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100650(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 11:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 3 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100650?
When was CVE-2026-100650 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100650 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100650?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100650?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100650
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100650?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.