Binutils objdump contains a denial-of-service vulnerability when processing a crafted binary with malformed DWARF debug information. A logic error in the handling of DWARF compilation units can result in an invalid offset_size value being used inside byte_get_little_endian, leading to an abort (SIGABRT). The issue was observed in binutils 2.44. A local attacker can trigger the crash by supplying a malicious input file.
CVE-2025-69645
Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-03-06. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.5
- EG Score
- 5.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 41(Track)EG Risk 41/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity55% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 6, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026sourceware.org Git - binutils-gdb.git/commit
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cdb728d4da6184631989b192f1022c219dea767733637 – objdump aborts with SIGABRT when processing malformed input (binutils 2.44)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33637Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-69645(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2025-69645Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
Binutils objdump contains a denial-of-service vulnerability when processing a crafted binary with malformed DWARF debug information. A logic error in the handling of DWARF compilation units can result in an invalid offset_size value being used inside byte_get_little_endian, leading to an abort (SIGABRT). The issue was observed in binutils 2.44. A local attacker can trigger the crash by supplying a malicious input file.
- RHSA-2026:7098Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | binutils-main-2.45.1-5.hum1 | 2026-04-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.35.2-2 ... 2.47-2 (213 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.40-2 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (122 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (48 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.45.90.20260201-1 (33 versions) | 2.46-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 23:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 52 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 08:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 06:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 06:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-69645?
When was CVE-2025-69645 disclosed?
Is CVE-2025-69645 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-69645?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-69645?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-69645
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-69645?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.