GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a double free vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed relocation data. During GOT relocation handling, dump_relocations may return early without initializing the all_relocations array. As a result, process_got_section_contents() may pass an uninitialized r_symbol pointer to free(), leading to a double free and terminating the program with SIGABRT. No evidence of exploitable memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service. NOTE: this is disputed by third parties because the observed behavior occurred only in pre-release code and did not affect any tagged version.
CVE-2025-69650
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-03-06. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 65(Attend)EG Risk 65/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 42%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 6, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Aug 2, 202633698 – readelf aborts with SIGABRT due to double free when processing malformed input (binutils 2.46(HEAD))
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33698sourceware.org Git - binutils-gdb.git/commit
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ea4bc025abdba85a90e26e13f551c16a44bfa921sourceware.org Git - binutils-gdb.git/commitdiff
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea4bc025abdba85a90e26e13f551c16a44bfa92sourceware.org Git - binutils-gdb.git/commitdiff
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=81e90cf63a10ad11772c2437c8f2a88f1a00c73933700 – readelf aborts with SIGABRT on crafted input due to invalid pointer free (binutils 2.46(HEAD))
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-69650(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2025-69650Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
GNU Binutils thru 2.46 readelf contains a double free vulnerability when processing a crafted ELF binary with malformed relocation data. During GOT relocation handling, dump_relocations may return early without initializing the all_relocations array. As a result, process_got_section_contents() may pass an uninitialized r_symbol pointer to free(), leading to a double free and terminating the program with SIGABRT. No evidence of exploitable memory corruption or code execution was observed; the impact is limited to denial of service.
- RHSA-2026:7098Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | binutils-main-2.45.1-5.hum1 | 2026-04-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.35.2-2 ... 2.47-2 (213 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.40-2 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (122 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.47.50.20260901-1 (48 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| binutils | 2.44-3 ... 2.45.90.20260201-1 (33 versions) | 2.46-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 23:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 68 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 23:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 07:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-69650?
When was CVE-2025-69650 disclosed?
Is CVE-2025-69650 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-69650?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-69650?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-69650
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-69650?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.