CVE-2025-68778

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction

We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current transaction, as this can result an attempt to have a directory with two hard links during log replay, one for the old parent directory and another for the new parent directory.

The following scenario triggers that issue:

1) We have directories "dir1" and "dir2" created in a past transaction. Directory "dir1" has inode A as its parent directory;

2) We move "dir1" to some other directory;

3) We create a file with the name "dir1" in directory inode A;

4) We fsync the new file. This results in logging the inode of the new file and the inode for the directory "dir1" that was previously moved in the current transaction. So the log tree has the INODE_REF item for the new location of "dir1";

5) We move the new file to some other directory. This results in updating the log tree to included the new INODE_REF for the new location of the file and removes the INODE_REF for the old location. This happens during the rename when we call btrfs_log_new_name();

6) We fsync the file, and that persists the log tree changes done in the previous step (btrfs_log_new_name() only updates the log tree in memory);

7) We have a power failure;

8) Next time the fs is mounted, log replay happens and when processing the inode for directory "dir1" we find a new INODE_REF and add that link, but we don't remove the old link of the inode since we have not logged the old parent directory of the directory inode "dir1".

As a result after log replay finishes when we trigger writeback of the subvolume tree's extent buffers, the tree check will detect that we have a directory a hard link count of 2 and we get a mount failure. The errors and stack traces reported in dmesg/syslog are like this:

[ 3845.729764] BTRFS info (device dm-0): start tree-log replay [ 3845.730304] page: refcount:3 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005c8a3027 index:0x1d00 pfn:0x11510c [ 3845.731236] memcg:ffff9264c02f4e00 [ 3845.731751] aops:btree_aops [btrfs] ino:1 [ 3845.732300] flags: 0x17fffc00000400a(uptodate|private|writeback|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [ 3845.733346] raw: 017fffc00000400a 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffff9264d978aea8 [ 3845.734265] raw: 0000000000001d00 ffff92650e6d4738 00000003ffffffff ffff9264c02f4e00 [ 3845.735305] page dumped because: eb page dump [ 3845.735981] BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=30408704 slot=6 ino=257, invalid nlink: has 2 expect no more than 1 for dir [ 3845.737786] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 30408704 gen 10 total ptrs 17 free space 14881 owner 5 [ 3845.737789] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 4 lock_owner 0 current 30701 [ 3845.737792] item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 [ 3845.737794] inode generation 3 transid 9 size 16 nbytes 16384 [ 3845.737795] block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 [ 3845.737797] rdev 0 sequence 2 flags 0x0 [ 3845.737798] atime 1764259517.0 [ 3845.737800] ctime 1764259517.572889464 [ 3845.737801] mtime 1764259517.572889464 [ 3845.737802] otime 1764259517.0 [ 3845.737803] item 1 key (256 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16111 itemsize 12 [ 3845.737805] index 0 name_len 2 [ 3845.737807] item 2 key (256 DIR_ITEM 2363071922) itemoff 16077 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737808] location key (257 1 0) type 2 [ 3845.737810] transid 9 data_len 0 name_len 4 [ 3845.737811] item 3 key (256 DIR_ITEM 2676584006) itemoff 16043 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737813] location key (258 1 0) type 2 [ 3845.737814] transid 9 data_len 0 name_len 4 [ 3845.737815] item 4 key (256 DIR_INDEX 2) itemoff 16009 itemsize 34 [ 3845.737816] location key (257 1 0) type 2 [ ---truncated---

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 13, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-68778(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-110.110) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.17.0-1010.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.17.0-22.22) @ questing2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-6.8.1-1047-realtime (6.8.1-1047.48~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-64k-6.17 (6.17.0-1012.12) @ questing2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.57+fips1) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1051.54) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.8 (6.8.0-1052.56) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2042.43) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k-6.17 (6.17.0-1011.11) @ questing2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1051.54.1) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.17 (6.17.0-1013.13) @ questing2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1049.50) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1054.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1029.30) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.17 (6.17.0-1014.14) @ questing2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1054.60) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.60+fips1) @ noble2026-05-21ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.1.160osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 129 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-27 02:39 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-23 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 20:47 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-21 06:47 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 19:27 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2025-68778?
CVE-2025-68778 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on January 13, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't log conflicting inode if it's a dir moved in the current transaction We can't log a conflicting inode if it's a directory and it was moved from one parent directory to another parent directory in the current…
When was CVE-2025-68778 disclosed?
CVE-2025-68778 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 13, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-68778 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68778 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.5% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68778?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-68778, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-68778

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68778?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.