CVE-2025-68756

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock

blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() functions add and remove queues from tagset, the functions make sure that tagset and queues are marked as shared when two or more queues are attached to the same tagset. Initially a tagset starts as unshared and when the number of added queues reaches two, blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set() marks it as shared along with all the queues attached to it. When the number of attached queues drops to 1 blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() need to mark both the tagset and the remaining queues as unshared.

Both functions need to freeze current queues in tagset before setting on unsetting BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED flag. While doing so, both functions hold set->tag_list_lock mutex, which makes sense as we do not want queues to be added or deleted in the process. This used to work fine until commit 98d81f0df70c ("nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset") made the nvme driver quiesce tagset instead of quiscing individual queues. blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() does the job and quiesce the queues in set->tag_list while holding set->tag_list_lock also.

This results in deadlock between two threads with these stacktraces:

__schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? timerqueue_add+0x66/0xb0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xa/0x10 __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x271/0x600 blk_mq_quiesce_tagset+0x25/0xc0 nvme_dev_disable+0x9c/0x250 nvme_timeout+0x1fc/0x520 blk_mq_handle_expired+0x5c/0x90 bt_iter+0x7e/0x90 blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x27e/0x550 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0x10/0x10 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x1c0/0x210 blk_mq_timeout_work+0x12d/0x170 process_one_work+0x12e/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x288/0x3a0 ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480 kthread+0xb8/0xe0 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20

__schedule+0x47c/0xbb0 ? xas_find+0x161/0x1a0 schedule+0x1c/0xa0 blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x3d/0x70 ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x30/0x30 blk_mq_update_tag_set_shared+0x44/0x80 blk_mq_exit_queue+0x141/0x150 del_gendisk+0x25a/0x2d0 nvme_ns_remove+0xc9/0x170 nvme_remove_namespaces+0xc7/0x100 nvme_remove+0x62/0x150 pci_device_remove+0x23/0x60 device_release_driver_internal+0x159/0x200 unbind_store+0x99/0xa0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x112/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x2b1/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x4e/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

The top stacktrace is showing nvme_timeout() called to handle nvme command timeout. timeout handler is trying to disable the controller and as a first step, it needs to blk_mq_quiesce_tagset() to tell blk-mq not to call queue callback handlers. The thread is stuck waiting for set->tag_list_lock as it tries to walk the queues in set->tag_list.

The lock is held by the second thread in the bottom stack which is waiting for one of queues to be frozen. The queue usage counter will drop to zero after nvme_timeout() finishes, and this will not happen because the thread will wait for this mutex forever.

Given that [un]quiescing queue is an operation that does not need to sleep, update blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() to use RCU instead of taking set->tag_list_lock, update blk_mq_{add,del}_queue_tag_set() to use RCU safe list operations. Also, delete INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set() because we can not re-initialize it while the list is being traversed under RCU. The deleted queue will not be added/deleted to/from a tagset and it will be freed in blk_free_queue() after the end of RCU grace period.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 5, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-68756(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 128 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-27 02:39 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-23 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 21:15 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 07:01 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 20:27 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2025-68756?
CVE-2025-68756 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on January 5, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Use RCU in blkmq[un]quiescetagset() instead of set->taglist_lock blkmq{add,del}queuetag_set() functions add and remove queues from tagset, the functions make sure that tagset and queues are marked as shared when two or more…
When was CVE-2025-68756 disclosed?
CVE-2025-68756 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 5, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-68756 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68756 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.7% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68756?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-68756, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-68756

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68756?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.