CVE-2025-68310

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asEUVD-2025-203759 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f5pp-8jv2-77ph (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/pci: Avoid deadlock between PCI error recovery and mlx5 crdump

Do not block PCI config accesses through pci_cfg_access_lock() when executing the s390 variant of PCI error recovery: Acquire just device_lock() instead of pci_dev_lock() as powerpc's EEH and generig PCI AER processing do.

During error recovery testing a pair of tasks was reported to be hung:

mlx5_core 0000:00:00.1: mlx5_health_try_recover:338:(pid 5553): health recovery flow aborted, PCI reads still not working INFO: task kmcheck:72 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 5.14.0-570.12.1.bringup7.el9.s390x #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kmcheck state:D stack:0 pid:72 tgid:72 ppid:2 flags:0x00000000 Call Trace: [<000000065256f030>] __schedule+0x2a0/0x590 [<000000065256f356>] schedule+0x36/0xe0 [<000000065256f572>] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x22/0x30 [<0000000652570a94>] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x484/0x8a8 [<000003ff800673a4>] mlx5_unload_one+0x34/0x58 [mlx5_core] [<000003ff8006745c>] mlx5_pci_err_detected+0x94/0x140 [mlx5_core] [<0000000652556c5a>] zpci_event_attempt_error_recovery+0xf2/0x398 [<0000000651b9184a>] __zpci_event_error+0x23a/0x2c0 INFO: task kworker/u1664:6:1514 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 5.14.0-570.12.1.bringup7.el9.s390x #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u1664:6 state:D stack:0 pid:1514 tgid:1514 ppid:2 flags:0x00000000 Workqueue: mlx5_health0000:00:00.0 mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err_work [mlx5_core] Call Trace: [<000000065256f030>] __schedule+0x2a0/0x590 [<000000065256f356>] schedule+0x36/0xe0 [<0000000652172e28>] pci_wait_cfg+0x80/0xe8 [<0000000652172f94>] pci_cfg_access_lock+0x74/0x88 [<000003ff800916b6>] mlx5_vsc_gw_lock+0x36/0x178 [mlx5_core] [<000003ff80098824>] mlx5_crdump_collect+0x34/0x1c8 [mlx5_core] [<000003ff80074b62>] mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_dump+0x6a/0xe8 [mlx5_core] [<0000000652512242>] devlink_health_do_dump.part.0+0x82/0x168 [<0000000652513212>] devlink_health_report+0x19a/0x230 [<000003ff80075a12>] mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err_work+0xba/0x1b0 [mlx5_core]

No kernel log of the exact same error with an upstream kernel is available - but the very same deadlock situation can be constructed there, too:

  • task: kmcheck
mlx5_unload_one() tries to acquire devlink lock while the PCI error recovery code has set pdev->block_cfg_access by way of pci_cfg_access_lock()
  • task: kworker
mlx5_crdump_collect() tries to set block_cfg_access through pci_cfg_access_lock() while devlink_health_report() had acquired the devlink lock.

A similar deadlock situation can be reproduced by requesting a crdump with > devlink health dump show pci/ reporter fw_fatal

while PCI error recovery is executed on the same physical function by mlx5_core's pci_error_handlers. On s390 this can be injected with > zpcictl --reset-fw

Tests with this patch failed to reproduce that second deadlock situation, the devlink command is rejected with "kernel answers: Permission denied" - and we get a kernel log message of:

mlx5_core 1ed0:00:00.1: mlx5_crdump_collect:50:(pid 254382): crdump: failed to lock vsc gw err -5

because the config read of VSC_SEMAPHORE is rejected by the underlying hardware.

Two prior attempts to address this issue have been discussed and ultimately rejected [see link], with the primary argument that s390's implementation of PCI error recovery is imposing restrictions that neither powerpc's EEH nor PCI AER handling need. Tests show that PCI error recovery on s390 is running to completion even without blocking access to PCI config space.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 16, 2025

Last Modified

April 15, 2026

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.158-1~deb11u1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.159-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.159-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (45 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.159-1: fixed in 6.1.159-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.63-1~bpo12+1 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.63-1: fixed in 6.12.63-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.17.8-1~bpo13+1 (79 versions)
  • every version up to 6.17.8-1: fixed in 6.17.8-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 229 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 130 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 10:44 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-27 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-27 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f5pp-8jv2-77ph
  14. 2026-10-26 00:55 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-03 17:19 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  24. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  26. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  32. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  33. 2026-09-14 07:50 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  35. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  38. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  39. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  41. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  45. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  46. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  47. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  48. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  49. 2026-08-26 09:13 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  51. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  52. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  53. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  54. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  55. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  56. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  57. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  58. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  59. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  61. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  62. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  63. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  64. 2026-08-09 23:34 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-09 23:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f5pp-8jv2-77ph
  66. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  67. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  68. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  69. 2026-08-06 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-06 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-06 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f5pp-8jv2-77ph
  72. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  73. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  74. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2025-68310?
CVE-2025-68310 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on December 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/pci: Avoid deadlock between PCI error recovery and mlx5 crdump Do not block PCI config accesses through pci_cfg_access_lock() when executing the s390 variant of PCI error recovery: Acquire just device_lock() instead of…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-68310 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-68310 was published on December 16, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of April 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-68310 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68310 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68310?
A fix for CVE-2025-68310 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-68310

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68310?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.