CVE-2025-40350

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-12-16. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ

XDP programs can change the layout of an xdp_buff through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() and bpf_xdp_adjust_head(). Therefore, the driver cannot assume the size of the linear data area nor fragments. Fix the bug in mlx5 by generating skb according to xdp_buff after XDP programs run.

Currently, when handling multi-buf XDP, the mlx5 driver assumes the layout of an xdp_buff to be unchanged. That is, the linear data area continues to be empty and fragments remain the same. This may cause the driver to generate erroneous skb or triggering a kernel warning. When an XDP program added linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_head(), the linear data will be ignored as mlx5e_build_linear_skb() builds an skb without linear data and then pull data from fragments to fill the linear data area. When an XDP program has shrunk the non-linear data through bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(), the delta passed to __pskb_pull_tail() may exceed the actual nonlinear data size and trigger the BUG_ON in it.

To fix the issue, first record the original number of fragments. If the number of fragments changes after the XDP program runs, rewind the end fragment pointer by the difference and recalculate the truesize. Then, build the skb with the linear data area matching the xdp_buff. Finally, only pull data in if there is non-linear data and fill the linear part up to 256 bytes.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
39%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 16, 2025

Last Modified

July 30, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 30, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87bcef158ac1faca1bd7e0104588e8e2956d10be
generic

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f2557d7fa38e9475b38588f5c124476091480f53
generic

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb9edd583e23979ee546981be963ad5f217e8b18
generic

net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8b051d7f530e8a5237da242fbeafef02fec6b813

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-40350(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 134 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 06:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-30 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-30 06:23 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  6. 2026-07-30 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-30 06:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  8. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-27 04:39 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 23:17 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 09:31 UTCOSV refresh
  42. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-02 00:09 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-40350?
CVE-2025-40350 is a critical vulnerability published on December 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: RX, Fix generating skb from non-linear xdp_buff for striding RQ XDP programs can change the layout of an xdp_buff through bpfxdpadjusttail() and bpfxdpadjusthead(). Therefore, the driver cannot assume the size of the…
When was CVE-2025-40350 disclosed?
CVE-2025-40350 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 16, 2025, with the most recent update on July 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-40350 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-40350 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 61.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-40350?
CVE-2025-40350 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-40350?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-40350, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-40350

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-40350?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.