In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme: fix admin request_queue lifetime
The namespaces can access the controller's admin request_queue, and
stale references on the namespaces may exist after tearing down the
controller. Ensure the admin request_queue is active by moving the
controller's 'put' to after all controller references have been released
to ensure no one is can access the request_queue. This fixes a reported
use-after-free bug:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in blk_queue_enter+0x41c/0x4a0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88c0a53819f8 by task nvme/3287
CPU: 67 UID: 0 PID: 3287 Comm: nvme Tainted: G E 6.13.2-ga1582f1a031e #15
Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: Jabil /EGS 2S MB1, BIOS 1.00 06/18/2025
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x4f/0x60
print_report+0xc4/0x620
? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xb0
? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x30
? blk_queue_enter+0x41c/0x4a0
kasan_report+0xab/0xe0
? blk_queue_enter+0x41c/0x4a0
blk_queue_enter+0x41c/0x4a0
? __irq_work_queue_local+0x75/0x1d0
? blk_queue_start_drain+0x70/0x70
? irq_work_queue+0x18/0x20
? vprintk_emit.part.0+0x1cc/0x350
? wake_up_klogd_work_func+0x60/0x60
blk_mq_alloc_request+0x2b7/0x6b0
? __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x1060/0x1060
? __switch_to+0x5b7/0x1060
nvme_submit_user_cmd+0xa9/0x330
nvme_user_cmd.isra.0+0x240/0x3f0
? force_sigsegv+0xe0/0xe0
? nvme_user_cmd64+0x400/0x400
? vfs_fileattr_set+0x9b0/0x9b0
? cgroup_update_frozen_flag+0x24/0x1c0
? cgroup_leave_frozen+0x204/0x330
? nvme_ioctl+0x7c/0x2c0
blkdev_ioctl+0x1a8/0x4d0
? blkdev_common_ioctl+0x1930/0x1930
? fdget+0x54/0x380
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x190
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7f765f703b0b
Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d dd 52 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe2cefe808 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe2cefe860 RCX: 00007f765f703b0b
RDX: 00007ffe2cefe860 RSI: 00000000c0484e41 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00007f765f611d50 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 00000000c0484e41 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007ffe2cefea60
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it