CVE-2025-68263

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-12-16. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request

ipc_msg_send_request() waits for a generic netlink reply using an ipc_msg_table_entry on the stack. The generic netlink handler (handle_generic_event()/handle_response()) fills entry->response under ipc_msg_table_lock, but ipc_msg_send_request() used to validate and free entry->response without holding the same lock.

Under high concurrency this allows a race where handle_response() is copying data into entry->response while ipc_msg_send_request() has just freed it, leading to a slab-use-after-free reported by KASAN in handle_generic_event():

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in handle_generic_event+0x3c4/0x5f0 [ksmbd] Write of size 12 at addr ffff888198ee6e20 by task pool/109349 ... Freed by task: kvfree ipc_msg_send_request [ksmbd] ksmbd_rpc_open -> ksmbd_session_rpc_open [ksmbd]

Fix by:

  • Taking ipc_msg_table_lock in ipc_msg_send_request() while validating
entry->response, freeing it when invalid, and removing the entry from ipc_msg_table.
  • Returning the final entry->response pointer to the caller only after
the hash entry is removed under the lock.
  • Returning NULL in the error path, preserving the original API
semantics.

This makes all accesses to entry->response consistent with handle_response(), which already updates and fills the response buffer under ipc_msg_table_lock, and closes the race that allowed the UAF.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
38%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 16, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fab1fa091f5aa97265648b53ea031deedd26235
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8229c6ca50cea701e25a7ee25f48441b582ec5fa
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/759c8c30cfa8706c518e56f67971b1f0932f4b9b
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5ac763713a1ef8f9a8bda1dbd81f0318d67baa4e
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/708a620b471a14466f1f52c90bf3f65ebdb31460
generic

ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipc_msg_send_request - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de85fb58f9967ba024bb08e0041613d37b57b4d1

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.159-1~deb11u1 (14 versions)6.1.162-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)6.1.162-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.63-1~bpo12+1 (8 versions)6.12.63-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.17.9-1 (83 versions)6.17.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 186 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 07:50 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 09:13 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-09 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-09 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-09 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-08 10:02 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-08 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-08 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-08 06:22 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-08 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-06 08:57 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-06 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-06 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-05 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-05 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-05 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-27 04:39 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-23 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-09 23:17 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-68263?
CVE-2025-68263 is a critical vulnerability published on December 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: ipc: fix use-after-free in ipcmsgsend_request ipcmsgsend_request() waits for a generic netlink reply using an ipcmsgtable_entry on the stack. The generic netlink handler (handlegenericevent()/handle_response()) fills…
When was CVE-2025-68263 disclosed?
CVE-2025-68263 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 16, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-68263 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-68263 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-68263?
CVE-2025-68263 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-68263?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-68263, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-68263

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-68263?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.