vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From versions 0.10.2 to before 0.11.1, a memory corruption vulnerability could lead to a crash (denial-of-service) and potentially remote code execution (RCE), exists in the Completions API endpoint. When processing user-supplied prompt embeddings, the endpoint loads serialized tensors using torch.load() without sufficient validation. Due to a change introduced in PyTorch 2.8.0, sparse tensor integrity checks are disabled by default. As a result, maliciously crafted tensors can bypass internal bounds checks and trigger an out-of-bounds memory write during the call to to_dense(). This memory corruption can crash vLLM and potentially lead to code execution on the server hosting vLLM. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.
CVE-2025-62164
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.9% (59th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%The EG Score, 8.8 of 10.Exploitation0.9% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 59th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 21, 2025
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026prompt_embeds deserialization allows DoS and potential RCE · Advisory · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-mrw7-hf4f-83pf[Frontend] Require flag for loading text and image embeds
Fix merged in vllm-project/vllm PR #27204 on 2025-10-22 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27204commit 58fab50d8283 (vllm-project/vllm)
Fix landed in vllm-project/vllm commit 58fab50d8283 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/58fab50d82838d5014f4a14d991fdb9352c9c84bVendor Advisories for CVE-2025-62164(11)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:30087Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3.5 (Spyre)
- RHSA-2026:19712Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3.3 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:3713Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:3462Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.2 (ROCm)
- RHSA-2026:3461Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.2 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2025:23531Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.1 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2025:23449Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.5 (ROCm)
- RHSA-2025:23209Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.5 (TPU)
- +3 more
Patch Availability(10)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-spyre-rhel9:1782352919 | 2026-06-25 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-vllm-cpu-rhel9:1778264363 | 2026-05-20 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-vllm-gaudi-rhel9:1770956034 | 2026-03-04 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1772160593 | 2026-02-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1772160625 | 2026-02-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9:v2.25.1-1765326513 | 2025-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.2.5-1765552603 | 2025-12-17 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.2.5-1765552580 | 2025-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.2.5-1765361180 | 2025-12-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-tpu-rhel9:3.2.5-1765552619 | 2025-12-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm | 0.10.2, 0.11.0 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(4)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 91 of 172 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 81 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-01 11:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
Show 66 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-12 10:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-24 15:33 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-08 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 09:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-23 15:11 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-23 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:vllm
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2025:23204 · redhat:RHSA-2026:19712
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-502 · CWE-787 · CWE-20
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-62164?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-62164 published?
Is CVE-2025-62164 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-62164?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-62164?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-62164
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-62164?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.