Insufficient input validation leading to memory overread when the NetScaler is configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) OR AAA virtual server
CVE-2025-5777
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-07-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
- 2,677 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running an affected version — derived from Shodan data (© Shodan); a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
- Linked to ransomware campaigns
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (Citrix Systems, Inc.) lists NetScaler ADC versions 14.1 up to but not including 43.56 and 13.1 up to but not including 58.32; NetScaler Gateway versions 14.1 up to but not including 43.56 and 13.1 up to but not including 58.32 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
2,677 internet-facing services (distinct ip:port) on record running a version that maps to CVE-2025-5777, in our KEV-Exposure radar’s Shodan-derived sample.
How it counts: every 12 hours, when Shodan query credits allow, the radar runs one Shodan query per tracked product, reads up to 100 ip:port services per query, and keeps a service when its banner version matches a CISA-KEV or high-EPSS CVE; a service is dropped when neither a search nor a Shodan InternetDB port re-check has refreshed it for 21 days. A re-check that finds the port still listed by Shodan InternetDB refreshes the service without re-reading the banner, so a patched service can stay counted while its port stays open. A count is a banner-version inference over a sample, not an exploit test and not an internet-wide census, and the unit is a service, not a machine: a machine answering on two ports counts twice.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 89EG Risk 89/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- >99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 7.5 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- >99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-23). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://support.citrix.com/support-home/kbsearch/article?articleNumber=CTX693420 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-5777
Published
June 17, 2025
Last Modified
October 8, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Oct 20, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-5777CVE-2025-5777: Citrix Bleed 2 Opens Old Wounds
https://reliaquest.com/blog/threat-spotlight-citrix-bleed-2-vulnerability-in-netscaler-adc-gateway-devices/CISA agrees that CitrixBleed 2 is under exploit
https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/10/cisa_citrixbleed_kev/NetScaler Critical Security Updates for CVE-2025-6543 and CVE-2025-5777
https://www.netscaler.com/blog/news/netscaler-critical-security-updates-for-cve-2025-6543-and-cve-2025-5777/CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cisa-tags-citrix-bleed-2-as-exploited-gives-agencies-a-day-to-patch/How Much More Must We Bleed? - Citrix NetScaler Memory Disclosure (CitrixBleed 2 CVE-2025-5777)
https://labs.watchtowr.com/how-much-more-must-we-bleed-citrix-netscaler-memory-disclosure-citrixbleed-2-cve-2025-5777/CVE-2025-5777: CitrixBleed 2 Write-Up… Maybe?
https://horizon3.ai/attack-research/attack-blogs/cve-2025-5777-citrixbleed-2-write-up-maybe/Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 145× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 918 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 818 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-22 17:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-21 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-20 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-18 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-18 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-16 15:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-15 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-14 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-13 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-12 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-11 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-10 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-09 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 07:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-08 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-07 03:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-06 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-05 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-04 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-03 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-02 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-10-01 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-09-30 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-29vj-j5w5-pcph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Publicly available exploits
(12 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 10 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- GitHub PoCndr-repo/CVE-2025-5777Published Aug 20, 2025
Exploit for CVE-2025-5777: Citrix NetScaler Memory Disclosure (CitrixBleed 2)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52401Published Aug 11, 2025
Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway 14.1 - Memory Disclosure
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCsoltanali0/CVE-2025-5777-ExploitPublished Aug 7, 2025
- GitHub PoCShivshantp/CVE-2025-5777-TrendMicro-ApexCentral-RCEPublished Jul 23, 2025
PoC for CVE-2025-5777 – Auth Bypass and RCE in Trend Micro Apex Central
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCcyberleelawat/ExploitVeerPublished Jul 15, 2025
An advanced, powerful, and easy-to-use tool designed to detect and exploit CVE-2025-5777 (CitrixBleed 2). This script not only identifies the vulnerability but also helps in demonstrating its impact by parsing human-readable information from the memory leak.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCbughuntar/CVE-2025-5777Published Jul 10, 2025
CVE-2025-5777 Citrix NetScaler Memory Leak Exploit (CitrixBleed 2)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCChocapikk/CVE-2025-5777Published Jul 8, 2025
CitrixBleed 2 (CVE-2025-5777)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCwin3zz/CVE-2025-5777Published Jul 8, 2025
CVE-2025-5777 (CitrixBleed 2) - Critical memory leak vulnerability affecting Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway devices
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCorange0Mint/CitrixBleed-2-CVE-2025-5777Published Jul 6, 2025
CitrixBleed-2 Checker & Poc automatic exploit and check token.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCnocerainfosec/cve-2025-5777Published Jul 5, 2025
Memory disclosure vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway when configured as a Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy).
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-908 · CWE-457 · CWE-125
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2025-5777?
When was CVE-2025-5777 made public?
Is CVE-2025-5777 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-5777?
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-5777?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-5777?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-5777
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-5777?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.