The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug.
CVE-2014-0160
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-04), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 96EG Risk 96/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high. - EPSS PROB
- 100%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
CISA SSVCAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
April 7, 2014
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated May 20, 2026OpenSSL ‘heartbleed’ bug live blog – Fox-IT International blog
http://blog.fox-it.com/2014/04/08/openssl-heartbleed-bug-live-blog/Mageia Advisory: MGASA-2014-0165 - Updated openssl package fix two security vulnerabilities
http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0165.htmlPatch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libssl1.0.0 (1.0.1e-3ubuntu1.2) @ saucy | 2026-10-06 | ubuntu |
| redhat | spice-client-msi-0:3.3-12 | 2014-04-17 | redhat |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor6-0:6.5-20140118.1.3.2.el6_5 | 2014-04-10 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7 | 2014-04-08 | redhat |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor6-0:6.5-20140407.0.el6ev | 2014-04-08 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1e-2, 1.0.1e-2+deb7u1, 1.0.1e-2+deb7u2, 1.0.1e-2+deb7u3, 1.0.1e-2+deb7u4 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(6)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0376IMPORTANT2014-04-07
RHSA-2014:0376 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0377IMPORTANT2014-04-07
RHSA-2014:0377 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0378IMPORTANT2014-04-07
RHSA-2014:0378 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0396IMPORTANT2014-04-07
RHSA-2014:0396 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0416IMPORTANT2014-04-07
RHSA-2014:0416 — Important
- UbuntuUSN-2165-1HIGH
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 92× in last 7d / 411× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,744 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-06 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-06 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 13:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 13:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-05 02:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 22:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 22:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 15:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-04 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 04:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 10:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 18:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 14:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 23:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 16:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 16:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 11:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 00:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 00:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
Publicly available exploits
(10 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (2 Metasploit modules) (4 GitHub PoCs) (4 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-32998✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 24, 2014
OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Information Leak (2) (DTLS Support)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-32791✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 10, 2014
OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Information Leak (1)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-32764✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 9, 2014
OpenSSL 1.0.1f TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Memory Disclosure (Multiple SSL/TLS Versions)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-32745✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 8, 2014
OpenSSL TLS Heartbeat Extension - 'Heartbleed' Memory Disclosure
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/ssl/openssl_heartbleed✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 8, 2014
Memory-dump auxiliary module — extracts up to 64KB per heartbeat from vulnerable TLS endpoints.
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/server/openssl_heartbeat_client_memory✓ verifiedFirst seen Apr 7, 2014
OpenSSL Heartbeat (Heartbleed) Client Memory Exposure
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmpgn/heartbleed-PoCFirst seen Mar 8, 2015
:broken_heart: Hearbleed exploit to retrieve sensitive information CVE-2014-0160 :broken_heart:
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCDisK0nn3cT/MaltegoHeartbleedFirst seen May 1, 2014
Maltego transform to detect the OpenSSL Heartbleed vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCeinaros/heartbleed-toolsFirst seen Apr 15, 2014
OpenSSL Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) vulnerability scanner, data miner and RSA key-restore tools.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCsensepost/heartbleed-pocFirst seen Apr 9, 2014
Test for SSL heartbeat vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160)
Open source ↗
Past incidents using this CVE
(1)This CVE was central to one or more publicly-documented breaches. Each card links to authoritative reporting at the time of the incident.
- Heartbleed (OpenSSL)Apr 2014500K+ affected
OpenSSL heartbeat extension leaked server memory 64KB at a time, exposing private keys and session data across ~500K servers worldwide.
Source: Wired
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:7:openssl
- CVE-2016-6303EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2182EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2177EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2108EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2842EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0799EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-0705EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-2107NVD 5.9EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-4000NVD 3.7EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-0224NVD 7.4EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
Same vendor
4 shownredhat:RHSA-2014:0416 · ubuntu:USN-2165-1
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2014-0160?
When was CVE-2014-0160 disclosed?
Is CVE-2014-0160 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-0160?
Which products are affected by CVE-2014-0160?
How do I remediate CVE-2014-0160?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-0160
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-0160?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.