CVE-2025-40303

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-08. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors

[BUG] During development of a minor feature (make sure all btrfs_bio::end_io() is called in task context), I noticed a crash in generic/388, where metadata writes triggered new works after btrfs_stop_all_workers().

It turns out that it can even happen without any code modification, just using RAID5 for metadata and the same workload from generic/388 is going to trigger the use-after-free.

[CAUSE] If btrfs hits an error, the fs is marked as error, no new transaction is allowed thus metadata is in a frozen state.

But there are some metadata modifications before that error, and they are still in the btree inode page cache.

Since there will be no real transaction commit, all those dirty folios are just kept as is in the page cache, and they can not be invalidated by invalidate_inode_pages2() call inside close_ctree(), because they are dirty.

And finally after btrfs_stop_all_workers(), we call iput() on btree inode, which triggers writeback of those dirty metadata.

And if the fs is using RAID56 metadata, this will trigger RMW and queue new works into rmw_workers, which is already stopped, causing warning from queue_work() and use-after-free.

[FIX] Add a special handling for write_one_eb(), that if the fs is already in an error state, immediately mark the bbio as failure, instead of really submitting them.

Then during close_ctree(), iput() will just discard all those dirty tree blocks without really writing them back, thus no more new jobs for already stopped-and-freed workqueues.

The extra discard in write_one_eb() also acts as an extra safenet. E.g. the transaction abort is triggered by some extent/free space tree corruptions, and since extent/free space tree is already corrupted some tree blocks may be allocated where they shouldn't be (overwriting existing tree blocks). In that case writing them back will further corrupting the fs.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 8, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 30, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2b3859067bf012d53c49b3f885fef40624a2c83
generic

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/54a5b5a15588e3b0b294df31474d08a2678d4291
generic

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2618849f31e7cf51fadd4a5242458501a6d5b315
generic

btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/066ee13f05fbd82ada01883e51f0695172f98dff

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-40303(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 139 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-05 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-05 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  11. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-30 06:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-27 06:09 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-10 00:45 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 11:31 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 03:09 UTCOSV refresh
  75. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-40303?
CVE-2025-40303 is a high vulnerability published on December 8, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: ensure no dirty metadata is written back for an fs with errors [BUG] During development of a minor feature (make sure all btrfsbio::endio() is called in task context), I noticed a crash in generic/388, where metadata writes…
When was CVE-2025-40303 disclosed?
CVE-2025-40303 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 8, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-40303 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-40303 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-40303?
CVE-2025-40303 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-40303?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-40303, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-40303

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-40303?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.