In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: BPF: No support of struct argument in trampoline programs
The current implementation does not support struct argument. This causes
a oops when running bpf selftest:
$ ./test_progs -a tracing_struct
Oops[#1]:
CPU -1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000018, era == 9000000085bef268, ra == 90000000844f3938
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
rcu: 1-...0: (19 ticks this GP) idle=1094/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1380/1382 fqs=801
rcu: (detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=1197, q=52 ncpus=4)
Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 1:
rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 2495 jiffies! g1197 f0x0 RCU_GP_DOING_FQS(6) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=2
rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
task:rcu_preempt state:I stack:0 pid:15 tgid:15 ppid:2 task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00000800
Stack : 9000000100423e80 0000000000000402 0000000000000010 90000001003b0680
9000000085d88000 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 9000000087159350
9000000085c2b9b0 0000000000000001 900000008704a000 0000000000000005
00000000ffff355b 00000000ffff355b 0000000000000000 0000000000000004
9000000085d90510 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 7b5d998f8281e86e
00000000ffff355c 7b5d998f8281e86e 000000000000003f 9000000087159350
900000008715bf98 0000000000000005 9000000087036000 900000008704a000
9000000100407c98 90000001003aff80 900000008715c4c0 9000000085c2b9b0
00000000ffff355b 9000000085c33d3c 00000000000000b4 0000000000000000
9000000007002150 00000000ffff355b 9000000084615480 0000000007000002
...
Call Trace:
[<9000000085c2a868>] __schedule+0x410/0x1520
[<9000000085c2b9ac>] schedule+0x34/0x190
[<9000000085c33d38>] schedule_timeout+0x98/0x140
[<90000000845e9120>] rcu_gp_fqs_loop+0x5f8/0x868
[<90000000845ed538>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x260/0x2e0
[<900000008454e8a4>] kthread+0x144/0x238
[<9000000085c26b60>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x28/0xc8
[<90000000844f20e4>] ret_from_kernel_thread_asm+0xc/0x88
rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran:
Sending NMI from CPU 0 to CPUs 2:
NMI backtrace for cpu 2 skipped: idling at idle_exit+0x0/0x4
Reject it for now.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it