In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add NULL pointer checks in dc_stream cursor attribute functions
The function dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes() currently dereferences
the stream pointer and nested members stream->ctx->dc->current_state
without checking for NULL.
All callers of these functions, such as in
dcn30_apply_idle_power_optimizations() and
amdgpu_dm_plane_handle_cursor_update(), already perform NULL checks
before calling these functions.
Fixes below:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c:336 dc_stream_program_cursor_attributes()
error: we previously assumed 'stream' could be null (see line 334)
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
327 bool dc_stream_program_cursor_attributes(
328 struct dc_stream_state *stream,
329 const struct dc_cursor_attributes *attributes)
330 {
331 struct dc *dc;
332 bool reset_idle_optimizations = false;
333
334 dc = stream ? stream->ctx->dc : NULL;
^^^^^^
The old code assumed stream could be NULL.
335
--> 336 if (dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes(stream, attributes)) {
^^^^^^
The refactor added an unchecked dereference.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_stream.c
313 bool dc_stream_set_cursor_attributes(
314 struct dc_stream_state *stream,
315 const struct dc_cursor_attributes *attributes)
316 {
317 bool result = false;
318
319 if (dc_stream_check_cursor_attributes(stream, stream->ctx->dc->current_state, attributes)) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Here.
This function used to check for if stream as NULL and return false at
the start. Probably we should add that back.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it