CVE-2025-39894

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm

When send a broadcast packet to a tap device, which was added to a bridge, br_nf_local_in() is called to confirm the conntrack. If another conntrack with the same hash value is added to the hash table, which can be triggered by a normal packet to a non-bridge device, the below warning may happen.

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 96 at net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:632 br_nf_local_in+0x168/0x200 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 96 Comm: tap_send Not tainted 6.17.0-rc2-dirty #44 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:br_nf_local_in+0x168/0x200 Call Trace: nf_hook_slow+0x3e/0xf0 br_pass_frame_up+0x103/0x180 br_handle_frame_finish+0x2de/0x5b0 br_nf_hook_thresh+0xc0/0x120 br_nf_pre_routing_finish+0x168/0x3a0 br_nf_pre_routing+0x237/0x5e0 br_handle_frame+0x1ec/0x3c0 __netif_receive_skb_core+0x225/0x1210 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x37/0xa0 netif_receive_skb+0x36/0x160 tun_get_user+0xa54/0x10c0 tun_chr_write_iter+0x65/0xb0 vfs_write+0x305/0x410 ksys_write+0x60/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xa4/0x260 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

To solve the hash conflict, nf_ct_resolve_clash() try to merge the conntracks, and update skb->_nfct. However, br_nf_local_in() still use the old ct from local variable 'nfct' after confirm(), which leads to this warning.

If confirm() does not insert the conntrack entry and return NF_DROP, the warning may also occur. There is no need to reserve the WARN_ON_ONCE, just remove it.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
23%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 1, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
generic Patch Available

[SECURITY] [DLA 4328-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d00c8b0daf56012f69075e3377da67878c775e4c
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ccbad4803225eafe0175d3cb19f0d8d73b504a94
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c47ca77fee9071aa543bae592dd2a384f895c8b6
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a74abcf0f09f59daeecf7a3ba9c1d690808b0afe
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50db11e2bbb635e38e3dd096215580d6adb41fb0
generic

netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/479a54ab92087318514c82428a87af2d7af1a576

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 107 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 12:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-05 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-05 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-30 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-30 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-30 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-23 18:41 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 01:35 UTCOSV refresh
  55. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-39894?
CVE-2025-39894 is a medium vulnerability published on October 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: brnetfilter: do not check confirmed bit in brnflocalin() after confirm When send a broadcast packet to a tap device, which was added to a bridge, brnflocal_in() is called to confirm the conntrack. If another conntrack…
When was CVE-2025-39894 disclosed?
CVE-2025-39894 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 1, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-39894 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-39894 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 77.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-39894?
CVE-2025-39894 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-39894?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-39894, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-39894

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-39894?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.