CVE-2025-39844

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-22. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h

During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe70000000034 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:__init_single_page+0x9/0x6d Call Trace: __init_zone_device_page+0x17/0x5d memmap_init_zone_device+0x154/0x1bb pagemap_range+0x2e0/0x40f memremap_pages+0x10b/0x2f0 devm_memremap_pages+0x1e/0x60 dev_dax_probe+0xce/0x2ec [device_dax] dax_bus_probe+0x6d/0xc9 [... snip ...]

It turns out that the kernel panics while initializing vmemmap (struct page array) when the vmemmap region spans two PGD entries, because the new PGD entry is only installed in init_mm.pgd, but not in the page tables of other tasks.

And looking at __populate_section_memmap(): if (vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap)) // does not sync top level page tables r = vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(pfn, start, end, nid, pgmap); else // sync top level page tables in x86 r = vmemmap_populate(start, end, nid, altmap);

In the normal path, vmemmap_populate() in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c synchronizes the top level page table (See commit 9b861528a801 ("x86-64, mem: Update all PGDs for direct mapping and vmemmap mapping changes")) so that all tasks in the system can see the new vmemmap area.

However, when vmemmap_can_optimize() returns true, the optimized path skips synchronization of top-level page tables. This is because vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() is implemented in core MM code, which does not handle synchronization of the top-level page tables. Instead, the core MM has historically relied on each architecture to perform this synchronization manually.

We're not the first party to encounter a crash caused by not-sync'd top level page tables: earlier this year, Gwan-gyeong Mun attempted to address the issue [1] [2] after hitting a kernel panic when x86 code accessed the vmemmap area before the corresponding top-level entries were synced. At that time, the issue was believed to be triggered only when struct page was enlarged for debugging purposes, and the patch did not get further updates.

It turns out that current approach of relying on each arch to handle the page table sync manually is fragile because 1) it's easy to forget to sync the top level page table, and 2) it's also easy to overlook that the kernel should not access the vmemmap and direct mapping areas before the sync.

The solution: Make page table sync more code robust and harder to miss

To address this, Dave Hansen suggested [3] [4] introducing {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() for updating kernel portion of the page tables and allow each architecture to explicitly perform synchronization when installing top-level entries. With this approach, we no longer need to worry about missing the sync step, reducing the risk of future regressions.

The new interface reuses existing ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK, PGTBL_P*D_MODIFIED and arch_sync_kernel_mappings() facility used by vmalloc and ioremap to synchronize page tables.

pgd_populate_kernel() looks like this: static inline void pgd_populate_kernel(unsigned long addr, pgd_t *pgd, p4d_t *p4d) { pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd, p4d); if (ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_SYNC_MASK & PGTBL_PGD_MODIFIED) arch_sync_kernel_mappings(addr, addr); }

It is worth noting that vmalloc() and apply_to_range() carefully synchronizes page tables by calling p*d_alloc_track() and arch_sync_kernel_mappings(), and thus they are not affected by ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 19, 2025

Last Modified

May 12, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-39844(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 124 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-27 11:09 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-10 05:53 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-21 16:10 UTCOSV refresh
  35. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-02 14:02 UTCOSV refresh
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-39844?
CVE-2025-39844 is a medium vulnerability published on September 19, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: move page table sync declarations to linux/pgtable.h During our internal testing, we started observing intermittent boot failures when the machine uses 4-level paging and has a large amount of persistent memory: BUG: unable to…
When was CVE-2025-39844 disclosed?
CVE-2025-39844 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 19, 2025, with the most recent update on May 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-39844 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-39844 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-39844?
CVE-2025-39844 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-39844?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-39844, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-39844

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-39844?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.