CVE-2025-39821

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-09-16. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events

Calling pmu->start()/stop() on perf events in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF can leave event->hw.idx at -1. When PMU drivers later attempt to use this negative index as a shift exponent in bitwise operations, it leads to UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds reports.

The issue is a logical flaw in how event groups handle throttling when some members are intentionally disabled. Based on the analysis and the reproducer provided by Mark Rutland (this issue on both arm64 and x86-64).

The scenario unfolds as follows:

  • A group leader event is configured with a very aggressive sampling
period (e.g., sample_period = 1). This causes frequent interrupts and triggers the throttling mechanism.
  • A child event in the same group is created in a disabled state
(.disabled = 1). This event remains in PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF. Since it hasn't been scheduled onto the PMU, its event->hw.idx remains initialized at -1.
  • When throttling occurs, perf_event_throttle_group() and later
perf_event_unthrottle_group() iterate through all siblings, including the disabled child event.
  • perf_event_throttle()/unthrottle() are called on this inactive child
event, which then call event->pmu->start()/stop().
  • The PMU driver receives the event with hw.idx == -1 and attempts to
use it as a shift exponent. e.g., in macros like PMCNTENSET(idx), leading to the UBSAN report.

The throttling mechanism attempts to start/stop events that are not actively scheduled on the hardware.

Move the state check into perf_event_throttle()/perf_event_unthrottle() so that inactive events are skipped entirely. This ensures only active events with a valid hw.idx are processed, preventing undefined behavior and silencing UBSAN warnings. The corrected check ensures true before proceeding with PMU operations.

The problem can be reproduced with the syzkaller reproducer:

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 16, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b64fdd422a85025b5e91ead794db9d3ef970e369
generic

perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d689135aa9c5e4e0eab5a92bbe35dab0c8d6677f

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.16.5osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-05 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-05 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-30 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 14:31 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 02:35 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 22:40 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-39821?
CVE-2025-39821 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: Avoid undefined behavior from stopping/starting inactive events Calling pmu->start()/stop() on perf events in PERFEVENTSTATE_OFF can leave event->hw.idx at -1. When PMU drivers later attempt to use this negative index as a…
When was CVE-2025-39821 disclosed?
CVE-2025-39821 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 16, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-39821 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-39821 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-39821?
CVE-2025-39821 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-39821?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-39821, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-39821

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-39821?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.