CVE-2025-39677

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-05. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdisc_dequeue_internal

This issue applies for the following qdiscs: hhf, fq, fq_codel, and fq_pie, and occurs in their change handlers when adjusting to the new limit. The problem is the following in the values passed to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call given a tbf parent:

When the tbf parent runs out of tokens, skbs of these qdiscs will be placed in gso_skb. Their peek handlers are qdisc_peek_dequeued, which accounts for both qlen and backlog. However, in the case of qdisc_dequeue_internal, ONLY qlen is accounted for when pulling from gso_skb. This means that these qdiscs are missing a qdisc_qstats_backlog_dec when dropping packets to satisfy the new limit in their change handlers.

One can observe this issue with the following (with tc patched to support a limit of 0):

export TARGET=fq tc qdisc del dev lo root tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: tbf rate 8bit burst 100b latency 1ms tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 1000 echo ''; echo 'add child'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo ping -I lo -f -c2 -s32 -W0.001 127.0.0.1 2>&1 >/dev/null echo ''; echo 'after ping'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc change dev lo handle 3: parent 1:1 $TARGET limit 0 echo ''; echo 'after limit drop'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo tc qdisc replace dev lo handle 2: parent 1:1 sfq echo ''; echo 'post graft'; tc -s -d qdisc show dev lo

The second to last show command shows 0 packets but a positive number (74) of backlog bytes. The problem becomes clearer in the last show command, where qdisc_purge_queue triggers qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog with the positive backlog and causes an underflow in the tbf parent's backlog (4096 Mb instead of 0).

To fix this issue, the codepath for all clients of qdisc_dequeue_internal has been simplified: codel, pie, hhf, fq, fq_pie, and fq_codel. qdisc_dequeue_internal handles the backlog adjustments for all cases that do not directly use the dequeue handler.

The old fq_codel_change limit adjustment loop accumulated the arguments to the subsequent qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog call through the cstats field. However, this is confusing and error prone as fq_codel_dequeue could also potentially mutate this field (which qdisc_dequeue_internal calls in the non gso_skb case), so we have unified the code here with other qdiscs.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 5, 2025

Last Modified

July 30, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-39677(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.16.4osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-30 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-23 20:41 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 15:11 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-18 03:35 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-29 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-05-29 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-39677?
CVE-2025-39677 is a medium vulnerability published on September 5, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: Fix backlog accounting in qdiscdequeueinternal This issue applies for the following qdiscs: hhf, fq, fq_codel, and fq_pie, and occurs in their change handlers when adjusting to the new limit. The problem is the following…
When was CVE-2025-39677 disclosed?
CVE-2025-39677 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 5, 2025, with the most recent update on July 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-39677 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-39677 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-39677?
CVE-2025-39677 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-39677?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-39677, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-39677

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-39677?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.