CVE-2025-38196

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-07-04. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

io_uring/rsrc: validate buffer count with offset for cloning

syzbot reports that it can trigger a WARN_ON() for kmalloc() attempt that's too big:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6488 at mm/slub.c:5024 __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x520/0x640 mm/slub.c:5024 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6488 Comm: syz-executor312 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-syzkaller-gd7fa1af5b33e #0 PREEMPT Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025 pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x520/0x640 mm/slub.c:5024 lr : __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:-1 [inline] lr : __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x3b4/0x640 mm/slub.c:5012 sp : ffff80009cfd7a90 x29: ffff80009cfd7ac0 x28: ffff0000dd52a120 x27: 0000000000412dc0 x26: 0000000000000178 x25: ffff7000139faf70 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: ffff800082f4cea8 x22: 00000000ffffffff x21: 000000010cd004a8 x20: ffff0000d75816c0 x19: ffff0000dd52a000 x18: 00000000ffffffff x17: ffff800092f39000 x16: ffff80008adbe9e4 x15: 0000000000000005 x14: 1ffff000139faf1c x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: ffff7000139faf21 x10: 0000000000000003 x9 : ffff80008f27b938 x8 : 0000000000000002 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 00000000ffffffff x4 : 0000000000400dc0 x3 : 0000000200000000 x2 : 000000010cd004a8 x1 : ffff80008b3ebc40 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: __kvmalloc_node_noprof+0x520/0x640 mm/slub.c:5024 (P) kvmalloc_array_node_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1065 [inline] io_rsrc_data_alloc io_uring/rsrc.c:206 [inline] io_clone_buffers io_uring/rsrc.c:1178 [inline] io_register_clone_buffers+0x484/0xa14 io_uring/rsrc.c:1287 __io_uring_register io_uring/register.c:815 [inline] __do_sys_io_uring_register io_uring/register.c:926 [inline] __se_sys_io_uring_register io_uring/register.c:903 [inline] __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x42c/0xea8 io_uring/register.c:903 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:35 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:49 el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:132 do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:151 el0_svc+0x58/0x17c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:767 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x78/0x108 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:786 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:600

which is due to offset + buffer_count being too large. The registration code checks only the total count of buffers, but given that the indexing is an array, it should also check offset + count. That can't exceed IORING_MAX_REG_BUFFERS either, as there's no way to reach buffers beyond that limit.

There's no issue with registrering a table this large, outside of the fact that it's pointless to register buffers that cannot be reached, and that it can trigger this kmalloc() warning for attempting an allocation that is too large.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 4, 2025

Last Modified

November 18, 2025

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 101 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 02:11 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 20:34 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 08:35 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-30 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-05-30 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-05-30 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-38196?
CVE-2025-38196 is a medium vulnerability published on July 4, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/rsrc: validate buffer count with offset for cloning syzbot reports that it can trigger a WARN_ON() for kmalloc() attempt that's too big: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6488 at mm/slub.c:5024 kvmallocnodenoprof+0x520/0x640…
When was CVE-2025-38196 disclosed?
CVE-2025-38196 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 4, 2025, with the most recent update on November 18, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-38196 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-38196 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-38196?
CVE-2025-38196 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-38196?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-38196, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-38196

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-38196?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.