CVE-2025-34291

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-05-21), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2025-201507 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-577h-p2hh-v4mv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 93%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
93%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
93% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow · https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/v1.9.3 · https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/issues/11465#event-25774545848 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-34291

Published

December 5, 2025

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: cisa.
Web page

CVE-2025-34291: Langflow AI Framework RCE Exploited

https://www.crowdsec.net/vulntracking-report/cve-2025-34291
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-34291
Web page

Langflow <= 1.6.9 CORS Misconfiguration to Token Hijack & RCE | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/langflow-cors-misconfiguration-to-token-hijack-and-rce
Web page🟡 PoC Available

CVE-2025-34291: Critical Account Takeover and RCE Vulnerability in the Langflow AI Agent & Workflow Platform

https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/blog/cve-2025-34291-critical-account-takeover-and-rce-vulnerability-in-the-langflow-ai-agent-workflow-platform
Web page

GitHub - langflow-ai/langflow: Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. · GitHub

https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-34291(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
piplangflow—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
langflow0.0.31 ... 1.6.9 (276 versions)
  • every version up to 1.7.0: fixed in 1.7.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 243 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 144 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-30 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-29 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-28 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-26 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-10-24 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-23 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-22 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-20 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-19 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-18 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-16 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-15 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-14 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-11 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  6. 2026-09-28 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
  8. 2026-09-26 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
  11. 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
  12. 2026-09-24 19:31 UTCCISA KEV update
  13. 2026-09-24 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-09-22 19:36 UTCCISA KEV update
  16. 2026-09-22 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-21 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-21 19:09 UTCCISA KEV update
  19. 2026-09-18 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  21. 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCCISA KEV update
  22. 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCCISA KEV update
  23. 2026-09-16 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-16 14:10 UTCCISA KEV update
  25. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 06:37 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-09-14 19:24 UTCCISA KEV update
  29. 2026-09-12 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 18:49 UTCCISA KEV update
  32. 2026-09-10 19:28 UTCCISA KEV update
  33. 2026-09-10 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-09-09 19:08 UTCCISA KEV update
  36. 2026-09-08 18:54 UTCCISA KEV update
  37. 2026-09-06 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  39. 2026-09-05 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-04 17:38 UTCCISA KEV update
  41. 2026-09-04 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 17:33 UTCCISA KEV update
  44. 2026-09-01 06:07 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  46. 2026-08-31 14:19 UTCCISA KEV update
  47. 2026-08-30 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-08-27 17:22 UTCCISA KEV update
  52. 2026-08-27 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  54. 2026-08-26 17:41 UTCCISA KEV update
  55. 2026-08-26 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  57. 2026-08-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-08-24 18:52 UTCCISA KEV update
  60. 2026-08-24 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-24 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-21 16:49 UTCCISA KEV update
  63. 2026-08-20 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-08-20 17:06 UTCCISA KEV update
  66. 2026-08-19 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-19 17:33 UTCCISA KEV update
  68. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-08-18 16:58 UTCCISA KEV update
  70. 2026-08-17 13:56 UTCCISA KEV update
  71. 2026-08-16 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-08-15 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile

Public detection templates

(1 reference)

A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34291.yaml
    Published Jan 3, 2026

    Langflow AI <= 1.6.9 - CORS Misconfiguration

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2025-34291?
CVE-2025-34291 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 5, 2025. Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (alloworigins='*' with allowcredentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-34291 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-34291 was published on December 5, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-34291 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2025-34291 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on May 21, 2026, affecting Langflow Langflow. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-34291?
CVE-2025-34291 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-34291?
CVE-2025-34291 affects Langflow Langflow. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2025-34291?
A fix for CVE-2025-34291 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-34291 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-34291

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-34291?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.