Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.
CVE-2025-34291
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-05-21), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2025-201507 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-577h-p2hh-v4mv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 80EG Risk 80/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact. - EPSS PROB
- 93%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 93% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow · https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/v1.9.3 · https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/issues/11465#event-25774545848 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-34291
Published
December 5, 2025
Last Modified
October 15, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026CVE-2025-34291: Langflow AI Framework RCE Exploited
https://www.crowdsec.net/vulntracking-report/cve-2025-34291Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-34291Langflow <= 1.6.9 CORS Misconfiguration to Token Hijack & RCE | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/langflow-cors-misconfiguration-to-token-hijack-and-rceCVE-2025-34291: Critical Account Takeover and RCE Vulnerability in the Langflow AI Agent & Workflow Platform
https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/blog/cve-2025-34291-critical-account-takeover-and-rce-vulnerability-in-the-langflow-ai-agent-workflow-platformGitHub - langflow-ai/langflow: Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. · GitHub
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflowVendor Advisories for CVE-2025-34291(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pip | langflow | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| langflow | 0.0.31 ... 1.6.9 (276 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 243 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 144 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-30 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 01:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-28 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-26 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-24 19:31 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-24 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 93% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 19:36 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-22 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 19:09 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-18 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:20 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-18 14:15 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-16 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:10 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 06:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-14 19:24 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-12 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 18:49 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-10 19:28 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-10 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-09 19:08 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-08 18:54 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-06 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 17:38 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-04 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 17:33 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-01 06:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-31 14:19 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-30 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 17:22 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-27 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 17:41 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-26 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 18:52 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-24 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 16:49 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-20 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 17:06 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-19 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:33 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-18 16:58 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-17 13:56 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-08-16 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
Public detection templates
(1 reference)A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.
- Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-34291.yamlPublished Jan 3, 2026
Langflow AI <= 1.6.9 - CORS Misconfiguration
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:langflow
- CVE-2026-10561EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-105697EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-7873EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33873EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33309EG 9.9EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-51886EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-9205EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-8505EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33017EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-27966EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2025-34291?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-34291 published?
Is CVE-2025-34291 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-34291?
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-34291?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-34291?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-34291
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-34291?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.