Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Before Langflow 1.10.3, the MCP stdio transport launched whatever command / args a user put in an MCP server configuration, with no allowlist and (before 1.10.3) wrapped in bash -c "exec {command} ...". Any user able to reach the MCP server settings ("Settings → MCP Servers → Add MCP Server", POST/PATCH /api/v2/mcp/servers/{server_name}) or to build a flow with the MCP Tools component could add a "server" whose command is an arbitrary OS command (touch, rm -rf, a reverse shell, ...). The command runs on the Langflow host as the Langflow process user as soon as Langflow tries to connect to the server (listing servers, loading tools, running the flow) — even when the UI then reports that the stdio server failed to start. With the default LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=true, GET /api/v1/auto_login hands out a token without credentials, so on an exposed instance running the default configuration this is reachable without an account. AUTO_LOGIN is documented as a development-only setting; with it disabled, any authenticated (non-admin) user can exploit it. This issue is fixed in Langflow 1.10.3, langflow-base 0.10.3, and lfx 1.10.3.
CVE-2026-105697
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity99% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 31st
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 5, 2026
Last Modified
October 6, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Oct 6, 2026Langflow < 1.10.3: OS command injection (RCE) via arbitrary command in MCP stdio server configuration · Advisory · langflow-ai/langflow · GitHub
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv451.10.3
Patch available: langflow-ai/langflow v1.10.3
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/releases/tag/v1.10.3fix(security): harden MCP stdio configuration
Fix merged in langflow-ai/langflow PR #14036 on 2026-07-14 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/14036fix: prevent MCP command injection via allowlist validation (CWE-78)
Fix merged in langflow-ai/langflow PR #12290 on 2026-03-27 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290commit efbc4a16e639 (langflow-ai/langflow)
Fix landed in langflow-ai/langflow commit efbc4a16e639 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0commit eba285edf1dd (langflow-ai/langflow)
Fix landed in langflow-ai/langflow commit eba285edf1dd — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/eba285edf1dd4a33bf23a9cb8113c991fcdf3d1dVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-105697(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-06 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-06 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 21:05 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-105697?
When was CVE-2026-105697 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-105697 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-105697?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-105697?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-105697
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-105697?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.