CVE-2025-21298

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-01-14. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekWeaponized

Also known asEUVD-2025-2363 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 74%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 74%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
89
EG Risk 89/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation74% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
74%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
74% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 14, 2025

Last Modified

January 24, 2025

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
MicrosoftMentions a patch (unverified)

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21298

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-21298(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 89× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 174 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 76 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-06 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-05 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-05 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-11-04 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-04 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-03 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-11-03 23:01 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-03 23:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-03 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-11-03 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-11-02 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-02 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-01 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-11-01 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-01 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-31 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-31 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-31 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 05:10 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-30 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-30 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-29 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-29 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-28 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-28 07:39 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-28 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-27 08:54 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-27 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-27 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-10-26 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-25 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  19. 2026-10-25 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-25 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-25 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-24 11:10 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-24 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-23 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-23 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  28. 2026-10-22 13:32 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-22 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 74% · 99th percentile
  31. 2026-10-21 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-21 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-21 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-20 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-19 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-19 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-19 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-18 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-18 18:11 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-18 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-18 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-17 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-17 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-17 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-16 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-10-16 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  49. 2026-10-15 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-10-15 17:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  52. 2026-10-14 11:48 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-14 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  55. 2026-10-13 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-13 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-12 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-10-12 12:07 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-12 12:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-f7p3-668r-j598 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-11 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-10-11 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-10-11 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  64. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  66. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  67. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  68. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  70. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  71. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
  73. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCynwarcs/CVE-2025-21298
    Published Jan 20, 2025

    Proof of concept & details for CVE-2025-21298

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-21298?
CVE-2025-21298 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 14, 2025. Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
When was CVE-2025-21298 made public?
CVE-2025-21298 was made public on January 14, 2025: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Microsoft Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on January 14, 2025. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 24, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-21298 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-21298 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 74% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-21298?
CVE-2025-21298 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-21298?
A fix for CVE-2025-21298 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-21298 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-21298

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-21298?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.