CVE-2024-58054

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-03-06. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2024-54045 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wvw9-x3jw-6hrq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

staging: media: max96712: fix kernel oops when removing module

The following kernel oops is thrown when trying to remove the max96712 module:

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00007375746174db Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000010af89000 [00007375746174db] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: crct10dif_ce polyval_ce mxc_jpeg_encdec flexcan snd_soc_fsl_sai snd_soc_fsl_asoc_card snd_soc_fsl_micfil dwc_mipi_csi2 imx_csi_formatter polyval_generic v4l2_jpeg imx_pcm_dma can_dev snd_soc_imx_audmux snd_soc_wm8962 snd_soc_imx_card snd_soc_fsl_utils max96712(C-) rpmsg_ctrl rpmsg_char pwm_fan fuse [last unloaded: imx8_isi] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 754 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G C 6.12.0-rc6-06364-g327fec852c31 #17 Tainted: [C]=CRAP Hardware name: NXP i.MX95 19X19 board (DT) pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : led_put+0x1c/0x40 lr : v4l2_subdev_put_privacy_led+0x48/0x58 sp : ffff80008699bbb0 x29: ffff80008699bbb0 x28: ffff00008ac233c0 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: ffff000080cf1170 x22: ffff00008b53bd00 x21: ffff8000822ad1c8 x20: ffff000080ff5c00 x19: ffff00008b53be40 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000004 x13: ffff0000800f8010 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: ffff000082acf5c0 x10: ffff000082acf478 x9 : ffff0000800f8010 x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x6 : fefefeff6364626d x5 : 8080808000000000 x4 : 0000000000000020 x3 : 00000000553a3dc1 x2 : ffff00008ac233c0 x1 : ffff00008ac233c0 x0 : ff00737574617473 Call trace: led_put+0x1c/0x40 v4l2_subdev_put_privacy_led+0x48/0x58 v4l2_async_unregister_subdev+0x2c/0x1a4 max96712_remove+0x1c/0x38 [max96712] i2c_device_remove+0x2c/0x9c device_remove+0x4c/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x1cc/0x228 driver_detach+0x4c/0x98 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 i2c_del_driver+0x54/0x64 max96712_i2c_driver_exit+0x18/0x1d0 [max96712] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1a4/0x290 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x34/0xd8 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Code: f9000bf3 aa0003f3 f9402800 f9402000 (f9403400) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

This happens because in v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(), the i2c_set_cliendata() is called again and the data is overwritten to point to sd, instead of priv. So, in remove(), the wrong pointer is passed to v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(), leading to a crash.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 6, 2025

Last Modified

January 22, 2026

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.128-1~deb11u1 (6 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.129-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.129-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.129-1: fixed in 6.1.129-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.13-1: fixed in 6.12.13-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.13-1: fixed in 6.12.13-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 205 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 110 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-03 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-03 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wvw9-x3jw-6hrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  8. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-27 17:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-27 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wvw9-x3jw-6hrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  17. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-25 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-10-19 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-19 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wvw9-x3jw-6hrq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  4. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-12 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-11 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 21:10 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  27. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  29. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  31. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  32. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-09-13 18:39 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  44. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  46. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  47. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  48. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  49. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  50. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  51. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  52. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  54. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  55. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  56. 2026-08-25 20:09 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  58. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  59. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  60. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  61. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  62. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  64. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  66. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  68. 2026-08-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  69. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  70. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-58054?
CVE-2024-58054 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 6, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staging: media: max96712: fix kernel oops when removing module The following kernel oops is thrown when trying to remove the max96712 module: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00007375746174db Mem abort…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-58054 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-58054 was published on March 6, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of January 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-58054 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-58054 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-58054?
CVE-2024-58054 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-58054?
A fix for CVE-2024-58054 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-58054

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-58054?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.