CVE-2024-35818

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

LoongArch: Define the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb()

Commit fb24ea52f78e0d595852e ("drivers: Remove explicit invocations of mmiowb()") remove all mmiowb() in drivers, but it says:

"NOTE: mmiowb() has only ever guaranteed ordering in conjunction with spin_unlock(). However, pairing each mmiowb() removal in this patch with the corresponding call to spin_unlock() is not at all trivial, so there is a small chance that this change may regress any drivers incorrectly relying on mmiowb() to order MMIO writes between CPUs using lock-free synchronisation."

The mmio in radeon_ring_commit() is protected by a mutex rather than a spinlock, but in the mutex fastpath it behaves similar to spinlock. We can add mmiowb() calls in the radeon driver but the maintainer says he doesn't like such a workaround, and radeon is not the only example of mutex protected mmio.

So we should extend the mmiowb tracking system from spinlock to mutex, and maybe other locking primitives. This is not easy and error prone, so we solve it in the architectural code, by simply defining the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb(). And we no longer need to override queued_spin_unlock() so use the generic definition.

Without this, we get such an error when run 'glxgears' on weak ordering architectures such as LoongArch:

radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 10324msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 3 stalled for more than 10240msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000001f412 last fence id 0x000000000001f414 on ring 3) radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000000f940 last fence id 0x000000000000f941 on ring 0) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn't update BO_VA (-35)

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
6.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 17, 2024

Last Modified

September 26, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.1.84osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 104 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-14 10:10 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-26 11:07 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 17:41 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-35818?
CVE-2024-35818 is a medium vulnerability published on May 17, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Define the io_aw() hook as mmiowb() Commit fb24ea52f78e0d595852e ("drivers: Remove explicit invocations of mmiowb()") remove all mmiowb() in drivers, but it says: "NOTE: mmiowb() has only ever guaranteed ordering in…
When was CVE-2024-35818 disclosed?
CVE-2024-35818 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 17, 2024, with the most recent update on September 26, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-35818 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-35818 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 6.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-35818?
CVE-2024-35818 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-35818?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-35818, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-35818

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-35818?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.