CVE-2024-35784

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking

While working on the patchset to remove extent locking I got a lockdep splat with fiemap and pagefaulting with my new extent lock replacement lock.

This deadlock exists with our normal code, we just don't have lockdep annotations with the extent locking so we've never noticed it.

Since we're copying the fiemap extent to user space on every iteration we have the chance of pagefaulting. Because we hold the extent lock for the entire range we could mkwrite into a range in the file that we have mmap'ed. This would deadlock with the following stack trace

[<0>] lock_extent+0x28d/0x2f0 [<0>] btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x273/0x8a0 [<0>] do_page_mkwrite+0x50/0xb0 [<0>] do_fault+0xc1/0x7b0 [<0>] __handle_mm_fault+0x2fa/0x460 [<0>] handle_mm_fault+0xa4/0x330 [<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x1f4/0x800 [<0>] exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x1e0 [<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [<0>] rep_movs_alternative+0x33/0x70 [<0>] _copy_to_user+0x49/0x70 [<0>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc8/0x120 [<0>] emit_fiemap_extent+0x4d/0xa0 [<0>] extent_fiemap+0x7f8/0xad0 [<0>] btrfs_fiemap+0x49/0x80 [<0>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3e1/0xb50 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x1a0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76

I wrote an fstest to reproduce this deadlock without my replacement lock and verified that the deadlock exists with our existing locking.

To fix this simply don't take the extent lock for the entire duration of the fiemap. This is safe in general because we keep track of where we are when we're searching the tree, so if an ordered extent updates in the middle of our fiemap call we'll still emit the correct extents because we know what offset we were on before.

The only place we maintain the lock is searching delalloc. Since the delalloc stuff can change during writeback we want to lock the extent range so we have a consistent view of delalloc at the time we're checking to see if we need to set the delalloc flag.

With this patch applied we no longer deadlock with my testcase.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
7.0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 17, 2024

Last Modified

January 10, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.6.24osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 105 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-14 09:55 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-26 10:39 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 17:41 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-35784?
CVE-2024-35784 is a medium vulnerability published on May 17, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking While working on the patchset to remove extent locking I got a lockdep splat with fiemap and pagefaulting with my new extent lock replacement lock. This deadlock exists with our…
When was CVE-2024-35784 disclosed?
CVE-2024-35784 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 17, 2024, with the most recent update on January 10, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-35784 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-35784 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 7.0% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-35784?
CVE-2024-35784 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-35784?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-35784, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-35784

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-35784?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.