CVE-2024-27415

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
4.7
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack

conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges.

Example: macvlan0 | br0 / \ ethX ethY

ethX (or Y) receives a L2 multicast or broadcast packet containing an IP packet, flow is not yet in conntrack table.

  • skb passes through bridge and fake-ip (br_netfilter)Prerouting.
-> skb->_nfct now references a unconfirmed entry
  • skb is broad/mcast packet. bridge now passes clones out on each bridge
interface.
  • skb gets passed up the stack.
  • In macvlan case, macvlan driver retains clone(s) of the mcast skb
and schedules a work queue to send them out on the lower devices.

The clone skb->_nfct is not a copy, it is the same entry as the original skb. The macvlan rx handler then returns RX_HANDLER_PASS.

  • Normal conntrack hooks (in NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) confirm the orig skb.

The Macvlan broadcast worker and normal confirm path will race.

This race will not happen if step 2 already confirmed a clone. In that case later steps perform skb_clone() with skb->_nfct already confirmed (in hash table). This works fine.

But such confirmation won't happen when eb/ip/nftables rules dropped the packets before they reached the nf_confirm step in postrouting.

Pablo points out that nf_conntrack_bridge doesn't allow use of stateful nat, so we can safely discard the nf_conn entry and let inet call conntrack again.

This doesn't work for bridge netfilter: skb could have a nat transformation. Also bridge nf prevents re-invocation of inet prerouting via 'sabotage_in' hook.

Work around this problem by explicit confirmation of the entry at LOCAL_IN time, before upper layer has a chance to clone the unconfirmed entry.

The downside is that this disables NAT and conntrack helpers.

Alternative fix would be to add locking to all code parts that deal with unconfirmed packets, but even if that could be done in a sane way this opens up other problems, for example:

-m physdev --physdev-out eth0 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.4 -m physdev --physdev-out eth1 -j SNAT --snat-to 1.2.3.5

For multicast case, only one of such conflicting mappings will be created, conntrack only handles 1:1 NAT mappings.

Users should set create a setup that explicitly marks such traffic NOTRACK (conntrack bypass) to avoid this, but we cannot auto-bypass them, ruleset might have accept rules for untracked traffic already, so user-visible behaviour would change.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
21(Track)
EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
6.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 17, 2024

Last Modified

September 26, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-27415(3)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-14 09:55 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-26 10:39 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-08 17:41 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-24 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-05-24 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-05-24 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-27415?
CVE-2024-27415 is a medium vulnerability published on May 17, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack conntrack nf_confirm logic cannot handle cloned skbs referencing the same nf_conn entry, which will happen for multicast (broadcast) frames on bridges.…
When was CVE-2024-27415 disclosed?
CVE-2024-27415 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 17, 2024, with the most recent update on September 26, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-27415 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-27415 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 6.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-27415?
CVE-2024-27415 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-27415?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-27415, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-27415

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-27415?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.