CVE-2023-53187

HIGHNVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-09-15. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused

If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused before we finish its creation, at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), then when btrfs_mark_bg_unused() is called against the block group, we assume that the block group is currently in the list of block groups to reclaim, and we move it out of the list of new block groups and into the list of unused block groups. This has two consequences:

1) We move it out of the list of new block groups associated to the current transaction. So the block group creation is not finished and if we attempt to delete the bg because it's unused, we will not find the block group item in the extent tree (or the new block group tree), its device extent items in the device tree etc, resulting in the deletion to fail due to the missing items;

2) We don't increment the reference count on the block group when we move it to the list of unused block groups, because we assumed the block group was on the list of block groups to reclaim, and in that case it already has the correct reference count. However the block group was on the list of new block groups, in which case no extra reference was taken because it's local to the current task. This later results in doing an extra reference count decrement when removing the block group from the unused list, eventually leading the reference count to 0.

This second case was caught when running generic/297 from fstests, which produced the following assertion failure and stack trace:

[589.559] assertion failed: refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299 [589.559] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [589.559] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299! [589.560] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [589.560] CPU: 8 PID: 2819134 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 [589.560] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [589.560] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.561] Code: 68 62 da c0 (...) [589.561] RSP: 0018:ffffa55a8c3b3d98 EFLAGS: 00010246 [589.561] RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff8f030d7f2000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [589.562] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff953f0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [589.562] RBP: ffff8f030d7f2088 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa55a8c3b3c50 [589.562] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8f05850b4c00 [589.562] R13: ffff8f030d7f2090 R14: ffff8f05850b4cd8 R15: dead000000000100 [589.563] FS: 00007f497fd2e840(0000) GS:ffff8f09dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [589.563] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [589.563] CR2: 00007f497ff8ec10 CR3: 0000000271472006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [589.563] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [589.564] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [589.564] Call Trace: [589.564] [589.565] ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60 [589.565] ? die+0x39/0x60 [589.565] ? do_trap+0xeb/0x110 [589.565] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.566] ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 [589.566] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.566] ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70 [589.566] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [589.567] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs] [589.567] close_ctree+0x35d/0x560 [btrfs] [589.568] ? fsnotify_sb_delete+0x13e/0x1d0 [589.568] ? dispose_list+0x3a/0x50 [589.568] ? evict_inodes+0x151/0x1a0 [589.568] generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0x1a0 [589.569] kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 [589.569] btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [589.569] deactivate_locked ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 15, 2025

Last Modified

December 2, 2025

References (3)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53187(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 20:41 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 15:01 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-18 03:05 UTCOSV refresh
  37. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-29 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-05-29 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53187?
CVE-2023-53187 is a high vulnerability published on September 15, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused before we finish its creation, at btrfscreatependingblockgroups(), then when…
When was CVE-2023-53187 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53187 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 15, 2025, with the most recent update on December 2, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53187 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53187 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53187?
CVE-2023-53187 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53187?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53187, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53187

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53187?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs