In Shadow 4.13, it is possible to inject control characters into fields provided to the SUID program chfn (change finger). Although it is not possible to exploit this directly (e.g., adding a new user fails because \n is in the block list), it is possible to misrepresent the /etc/passwd file when viewed. Use of \r manipulations and Unicode characters to work around blocking of the : character make it possible to give the impression that a new user has been added. In other words, an adversary may be able to convince a system administrator to take the system offline (an indirect, social-engineered denial of service) by demonstrating that "cat /etc/passwd" shows a rogue user account.
CVE-2023-29383
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 3.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2023-04-15. NVD baseline CVSS 3.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.3
- EG Score
- 3.3LOWmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 31EG Risk 31/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity33% × 45%The EG Score, 3.3 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 14, 2023
Last Modified
November 3, 2025
References (5)
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/commit/e5905c4b84d4fb90aefcd96ee618411ebfac663dPatch
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/pull/687Issue Tracking
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://www.trustwave.com/en-us/resources/blogs/spiderlabs-blog/cve-2023-29383-abusing-linux-chfn-to-misrepresent-etc-passwd/Exploit · Third Party Advisory
- MITRE · CVE Programhttps://www.trustwave.com/en-us/resources/security-resources/security-advisories/?fid=31797Exploit · Third Party Advisory
- CVE Programhttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/04/msg00026.html
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-29383(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| shadow | 1:4.8.1-1 |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| shadow | 1:4.13+dfsg1-1 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| shadow | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| shadow | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 87 of 179 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 13 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 92 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-23 14:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
Show 62 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-04 09:16 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-17 19:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-02 15:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-15 22:53 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:shadow
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2023-29383?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-29383 published?
Is CVE-2023-29383 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-29383?
How do I remediate CVE-2023-29383?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-29383
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-29383?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.