CVE-2023-28842

MEDIUMNVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.4% (72nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.4%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Moby) is an open source container framework developed by Docker Inc. that is distributed as Docker, Mirantis Container Runtime, and various other downstream projects/products. The Moby daemon component (dockerd), which is developed as moby/moby is commonly referred to as *Docker*.

Swarm Mode, which is compiled in and delivered by default in dockerd and is thus present in most major Moby downstreams, is a simple, built-in container orchestrator that is implemented through a combination of SwarmKit and supporting network code.

The overlay network driver is a core feature of Swarm Mode, providing isolated virtual LANs that allow communication between containers and services across the cluster. This driver is an implementation/user of VXLAN, which encapsulates link-layer (Ethernet) frames in UDP datagrams that tag the frame with the VXLAN metadata, including a VXLAN Network ID (VNI) that identifies the originating overlay network. In addition, the overlay network driver supports an optional, off-by-default encrypted mode, which is especially useful when VXLAN packets traverses an untrusted network between nodes.

Encrypted overlay networks function by encapsulating the VXLAN datagrams through the use of the IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload protocol in Transport mode. By deploying IPSec encapsulation, encrypted overlay networks gain the additional properties of source authentication through cryptographic proof, data integrity through check-summing, and confidentiality through encryption.

When setting an endpoint up on an encrypted overlay network, Moby installs three iptables (Linux kernel firewall) rules that enforce both incoming and outgoing IPSec. These rules rely on the u32 iptables extension provided by the xt_u32 kernel module to directly filter on a VXLAN packet's VNI field, so that IPSec guarantees can be enforced on encrypted overlay networks without interfering with other overlay networks or other users of VXLAN.

The overlay driver dynamically and lazily defines the kernel configuration for the VXLAN network on each node as containers are attached and detached. Routes and encryption parameters are only defined for destination nodes that participate in the network. The iptables rules that prevent encrypted overlay networks from accepting unencrypted packets are not created until a peer is available with which to communicate.

Encrypted overlay networks silently accept cleartext VXLAN datagrams that are tagged with the VNI of an encrypted overlay network. As a result, it is possible to inject arbitrary Ethernet frames into the encrypted overlay network by encapsulating them in VXLAN datagrams. The implications of this can be quite dire, and GHSA-vwm3-crmr-xfxw should be referenced for a deeper exploration.

Patches are available in Moby releases 23.0.3, and 20.10.24. As Mirantis Container Runtime's 20.10 releases are numbered differently, users of that platform should update to 20.10.16.

Some workarounds are available. In multi-node clusters, deploy a global ‘pause’ container for each encrypted overlay network, on every node. For a single-node cluster, do not use overlay networks of any sort. Bridge networks provide the same connectivity on a single node and have no multi-node features. The Swarm ingress feature is implemented using an overlay network, but can be disabled by publishing ports in host mode instead of ingress mode (allowing the use of an external load balancer), and removing the ingress network. If encrypted overlay networks are in exclusive use, block UDP port 4789 from traffic that has not been validated by IPSec.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
31
EG Risk 31/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity68% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
1.4%
EPSS %ILE
72nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.8 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 4, 2023

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-28842(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntugolang-github-docker-docker-dev (20.10.25+dfsg1-2ubuntu1+esm2) @ noble2026-05-25ubuntu
redhatmulticluster-engine/work-rhel8:v2.4.4-62024-03-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
docker.io20.10.10+dfsg1-1 ... 28.5.2+dfsg4-3 (61 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
docker.io—
  • every version up to 20.10.24+dfsg1-1: fixed in 20.10.24+dfsg1-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
docker.io—
  • every version up to 20.10.24+dfsg1-1: fixed in 20.10.24+dfsg1-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
docker.io—
  • every version up to 20.10.24+dfsg1-1: fixed in 20.10.24+dfsg1-1
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/docker/docker—
  • 1.12.0 up to 20.10.24: fixed in 20.10.24
  • 23.0.0 up to 23.0.3: fixed in 23.0.3
  • 1.12.0 up to 20.10.24+incompatible: fixed in 20.10.24+incompatible
  • 23.0.0+incompatible up to 23.0.3+incompatible: fixed in 23.0.3+incompatible
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 91 of 192 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 101 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 08:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 14:24 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-11 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  2. 2026-09-30 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  4. 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-23 16:04 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-22 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
  12. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  13. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  14. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  15. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  16. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  17. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  18. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  19. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  20. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  21. 2026-09-04 10:46 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  23. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  24. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  25. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  26. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  27. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  28. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  29. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  30. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  31. 2026-08-24 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  32. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  33. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  34. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  35. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
  36. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  37. 2026-08-17 21:29 UTCOSV refresh
  38. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  39. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  40. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  41. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  42. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  43. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  44. 2026-08-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  45. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  46. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  47. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  48. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  49. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  50. 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  51. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  52. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  53. 2026-08-02 16:57 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  55. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  56. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  57. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  58. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  59. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  60. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  61. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  62. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  63. 2026-07-23 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-22 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile
  66. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 70th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-28842?
CVE-2023-28842 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 4, 2023. Moby) is an open source container framework developed by Docker Inc. that is distributed as Docker, Mirantis Container Runtime, and various other downstream projects/products. The Moby daemon component (dockerd), which is developed as moby/moby is commonly referred to as Docker. Swarm Mode, which…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-28842 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-28842 was published on April 4, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 21, 2024; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-28842 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-28842 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (72nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-28842?
CVE-2023-28842 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-28842?
A fix for CVE-2023-28842 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-28842 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-28842

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-28842?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.