On Windows, if Git LFS operates on a malicious repository with a ..exe file as well as a file named git.exe, and git.exe is not found in PATH, the ..exe program will be executed, permitting the attacker to execute arbitrary code. This does not affect Unix systems. Similarly, if the malicious repository contains files named ..exe and cygpath.exe, and cygpath.exe is not found in PATH, the ..exe program will be executed when certain Git LFS commands are run. More generally, if the current working directory contains any file with a base name of . and a file extension from PATHEXT (except .bat and .cmd), and also contains another file with the same base name as a program Git LFS intends to execute (such as git, cygpath, or uname) and any file extension from PATHEXT (including .bat and .cmd), then, on Windows, when Git LFS attempts to execute the intended program the ..exe, ..com, etc., file will be executed instead, but only if the intended program is not found in any directory listed in PATH. The vulnerability occurs because when Git LFS detects that the program it intends to run does not exist in any directory listed in PATH then Git LFS passes an empty string as the executable file path to the Go os/exec package, which contains a bug such that, on Windows, it prepends the name of the current working directory (i.e., .) to the empty string without adding a path separator, and as a result searches in that directory for a file with the base name . combined with any file extension from PATHEXT, executing the first one it finds. (The reason ..bat and ..cmd files are not executed in the same manner is that, although the Go os/exec package tries to execute them just as it does a ..exe file, the Microsoft Win32 API CreateProcess() family of functions have an undocumented feature in that they apparently recognize when a caller is attempting to execute a batch script file and instead run the cmd.exe command interpreter, passing the full set of command line arguments as parameters. These are unchanged from the command line arguments set by Git LFS, and as such, the intended program's name is the first, resulting in a command line like cmd.exe /c git, which then fails.) Git LFS has resolved this vulnerability by always reporting an error when a program is not found in any directory listed in PATH rather than passing an empty string to the Go os/exec package in this case. The bug in the Go os/exec package has been reported to the Go project and is expected to be patched after this security advisory is published. The problem was introduced in version 2.12.1 and is patched in version 3.1.3. Users of affected versions should upgrade to version 3.1.3. There are currently no known workarounds at this time.
CVE-2022-24826
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 2.2% (82nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation2.2% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 2.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 82nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 2.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 20, 2022
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 11, 2026Git LFS can execute a binary from the current directory on Windows · Advisory · git-lfs/git-lfs · GitHub
Affected: v3.1.3 and v3.1.4. Users of affected versions should upgrade to v3.1.4.
https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/security/advisories/GHSA-6rw3-3whw-jvjjAffected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs | — |
| — |
| github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/v3 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 191 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 95 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-22 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-19 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-17 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 04:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-09 20:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-25 00:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-05 16:21 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-19 02:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-03 22:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
5 shownGo:github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/v3 · Go:github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2022-24826?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-24826 published?
Is CVE-2022-24826 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-24826?
How do I remediate CVE-2022-24826?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-24826
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-24826?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.