In the Druid ingestion system, the InputSource is used for reading data from a certain data source. However, the HTTP InputSource allows authenticated users to read data from other sources than intended, such as the local file system, with the privileges of the Druid server process. This is not an elevation of privilege when users access Druid directly, since Druid also provides the Local InputSource, which allows the same level of access. But it is problematic when users interact with Druid indirectly through an application that allows users to specify the HTTP InputSource, but not the Local InputSource. In this case, users could bypass the application-level restriction by passing a file URL to the HTTP InputSource. This issue was previously mentioned as being fixed in 0.21.0 as per CVE-2021-26920 but was not fixed in 0.21.0 or 0.21.1.
CVE-2021-36749
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 8.8 because EPSS predicted 81% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 6.5 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 81%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 8.8HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 62EG Risk 62/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation81% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 81%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 6.5 MEDIUM): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 81% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-20). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 24, 2021
Last Modified
November 21, 2024
References (2)
- security@apache · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r304dfe56a5dfe1b2d9166b24d2c74ad1c6730338b20aef77a00ed2be%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E
- security@apache · CVE Programhttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc9400a70d0ec5cdb8a3486fc5ddb0b5282961c0b63e764abfbcb9f5d%40%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3EMailing List · Vendor Advisory
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.druid:druid-core | 0.14.0-incubating ... 0.21.1 (17 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 82 of 89 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 18 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 7 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-11 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-25 15:45 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
Show 57 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-21 20:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 06:22 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:28 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-04 13:27 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-04 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:03 UTCEG score recompute▲ 2.30
- 2026-07-22 22:49 UTCEG score recompute▼ 2.50
- 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-30 12:30 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-15 17:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 81% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-12 20:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 94% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 94% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 94% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-02 20:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 94% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 94% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Nucleihttp/cves/2021/CVE-2021-36749.yamlPublished Oct 25, 2021
Apache Druid - Local File Inclusion
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCBrucessKING/CVE-2021-36749Published Oct 14, 2021
Apache Druid 任意文件读取
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCsma11new/PocListPublished May 22, 2021
漏洞POC、EXP合集,持续更新。Apache Druid-任意文件读取(CVE-2021-36749)、ConfluenceRCE(CVE-2021-26084)、ZeroShell防火墙RCE(CVE-2019-12725)、ApacheSolr任意文件读取、蓝凌OA任意文件读取、phpStudyRCE、ShowDoc任意文件上传、原创先锋后台未授权、Kyan账号密码泄露、TerraMasterTos任意文件读取、TamronOS-IPTV系统RCE、Wayos防火墙账号密码泄露
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-863
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2021-36749?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2021-36749 published?
Is CVE-2021-36749 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2021-36749?
How do I remediate CVE-2021-36749?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2021-36749
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2021-36749?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.