Buffer overflow in the mipsnet_receive function in hw/net/mipsnet.c in QEMU, when the guest NIC is configured to accept large packets, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and QEMU crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a packet larger than 1514 bytes.
CVE-2016-4002
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2022-05-13. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 51EG Risk 51/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation6% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 6.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 93rd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
April 26, 2016
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Sep 30, 2026[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net: mipsnet: check packet length against buffer
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-04/msg01131.html[SECURITY] [DLA 1599-1] qemu security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html1326082 – (CVE-2016-4002) CVE-2016-4002 Qemu: net: buffer overflow in MIPSnet emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326082oss-security - Re: CVE Request: Qemu: net: buffer overflow in MIPSnet emulator
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/12/7oss-security - CVE Request: Qemu: net: buffer overflow in MIPSnet emulator
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/11/6Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | qemu-system-x86 (1:2.3+dfsg-5ubuntu9.4) @ wily | 2026-05-20 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| qemu | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| qemu | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| qemu | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| qemu | — |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| qemu | 1:2.1+dfsg-11 ... 1:2.1+dfsg-12~bpo70+1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 168 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 07:04 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 19:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 21:14 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 03:31 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 20:46 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 00:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 11:09 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 11:41 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:43 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 06:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-07 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-29 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-22 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-21 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:8:qemu
- CVE-2017-16845EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-9603NVD 5.5EG 9.9EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-2620NVD 5.5EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-20815EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-17963EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-7161EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-5165EG 9.3EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2017-2615NVD 5.5EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-7512EG 9.0EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-14378EG 8.8EPSS p97HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu:USN-2974-1
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-120
- CVE-2016-4001EG 8.6EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2016-0099NVD 7.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-7512EG 9.0EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-6366NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-4303EG 9.8EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-5343EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-8668EG 6.0MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-6490EG 4.4MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-6834EG 4.4MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-7422EG 6.0MEDIUM
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2016-4002?
When was CVE-2016-4002 disclosed?
Is CVE-2016-4002 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-4002?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-4002?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-4002
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-4002?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.