The Fileserver web application in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.14.0 allows remote attackers to upload and execute arbitrary files via an HTTP PUT followed by an HTTP MOVE request.
CVE-2016-3088
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-02-10), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity98% × 45%Exploitation100% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
CISA SSVCAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
June 1, 2016
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (9)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026ActiveMQ < 5.14.0 - Web Shell Upload (Metasploit) - Java remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42283/Pony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6d03e45b81eab03580cf7f8bb51cb3e9a1b10a2cc0c6a2d3cc92ed0c%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3EPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f956ea38e4da2e2c1e7131e6f91e41754852f5a4861d1a14ca5ca78a%40%3Cusers.activemq.apache.org%3EPony Mail
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a859563f05fbe7c31916b3178c2697165bd9bbf5a65d1cf62aef27d2%40%3Ccommits.activemq.apache.org%3EZDI-16-357 - TrendAI™ Zero Day Initiative™ (ZDI)
http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-357ZDI-16-356 - TrendAI™ Zero Day Initiative™ (ZDI)
http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-16-356Vendor Advisories for CVE-2016-3088(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | patch | 2016-10-06 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2015-06-23 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| activemq | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| activemq | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| activemq | — |
| — |
Maven(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| org.apache.activemq:activemq-client | 5.10.0 ... 5.9.1 (21 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 45× in last 7d / 212× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 947 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-10 09:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 06:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 18:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 00:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 20:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 05:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-06 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 08:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 21:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 15:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 09:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 05:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 01:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 14:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 11:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 20:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 08:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 17:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 23:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-27 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 03:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 19:35 UTCCISA KEV update
- 2026-09-25 17:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 14:55 UTCCISA KEV update
Publicly available exploits
(9 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module) (5 GitHub PoCs) (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-42283✓ verifiedFirst seen Jun 29, 2017
ActiveMQ < 5.14.0 - Web Shell Upload (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/multi/http/apache_activemq_upload_jsp✓ verifiedFirst seen Jun 1, 2016
ActiveMQ web shell upload
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-40857✓ verifiedFirst seen Aug 17, 2015
Apache ActiveMQ 5.11.1/5.13.2 - Directory Traversal / Command Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCCatherines77/ActiveMQ-EXPtoolsFirst seen Apr 20, 2026
Apache ActiveMQ漏洞综合利用工具(CVE-2015-5254,CVE-2016-3088,CVE-2022-41678,CVE-2023-46604,CVE-2024-32114,CVE-2026-34197,CVE-2026-40466)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCYutuSec/ActiveMQ_CrackFirst seen Apr 2, 2022
ActiveMQ系列漏洞探测利用工具,包括ActiveMQ 默认口令漏洞及ActiveMQ任意文件写入漏洞(CVE-2016-3088),支持批量探测利用。
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCcl4ym0re/CVE-2016-3088First seen Jul 3, 2021
Apache ActiveMQ PUT RCE Scan
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCcyberaguiar/CVE-2016-3088First seen Mar 11, 2021
Apache ActiveMQ Remote Code Execution Exploit
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCMa1Dong/ActiveMQ_putshell-CVE-2016-3088First seen Jul 31, 2020
ActiveMQ_putshell直接获取webshell
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2016/CVE-2016-3088.yamlFirst seen Jan 1, 2016
Apache ActiveMQ Fileserver - Arbitrary File Write
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:org.apache.activemq:activemq-client
- CVE-2023-46604EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-3600EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-5254EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-39304EG 7.5HIGH
- CVE-2025-27533EG 7.5EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2019-0222EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2014-3576EG 7.5EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2018-11775EG 7.4EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2016-6810EG 6.1EPSS p93MEDIUM
- CVE-2016-0782EG 5.4EPSS p93MEDIUM
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2016:2036 · redhat:RHSA-2015:1176
- CVE-2016-4437EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-5254EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-0226EG 7.5EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2014-5075EG 6.8MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-3577EG 5.8EPSS p95MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-0363EG 5.8MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-3192EG 5.5MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-7940EG 5.0EPSS p92MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0227EG 5.0EPSS p94MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-0364EG 5.0EPSS p93MEDIUM
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-434
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2016-3088?
When was CVE-2016-3088 disclosed?
Is CVE-2016-3088 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2016-3088?
Which products are affected by CVE-2016-3088?
How do I remediate CVE-2016-3088?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2016-3088
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2016-3088?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.