Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the (1) send_dg and (2) send_vc functions in the libresolv library in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted DNS response that triggers a call to the getaddrinfo function with the AF_UNSPEC or AF_INET6 address family, related to performing "dual A/AAAA DNS queries" and the libnss_dns.so.2 NSS module.
CVE-2015-7547
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 91% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). NVD baseline CVSS 8.1 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 91%
- Public exploit code is available (Exploit-DB (verified), epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 81EG Risk 81/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity90% × 45%Exploitation91% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 91%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (EG-KEV: weaponized) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
February 18, 2016
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (150)
- secalert@redhathttp://fortiguard.com/advisory/glibc-getaddrinfo-stack-overflow
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177404.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177412.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00036.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00037.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00038.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00039.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00042.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00043.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-02/msg00044.html
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145596041017029&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145672440608228&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145690841819314&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145857691004892&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=146161017210491&w=2
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-7547(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libc6 (2.15-0ubuntu10.13) @ precise | 2026-05-22 | ubuntu |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor7-0:7.2-20160105.2.el7ev | 2016-02-19 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.12-1.166.el6_7.7 | 2016-02-16 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.17-79.ael7b_1.4 | 2016-02-16 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.17-106.el7_2.4 | 2016-02-16 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — |
| — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| eglibc | 2.11.2-10 ... 2.11.3-4 (10 versions) |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| eglibc | 2.13-38 ... 2.13-38+deb7u9 (10 versions) |
| — |
Debian:8(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | 2.19-18, 2.19-18+deb8u1, 2.19-18+deb8u2 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(5)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0175CRITICAL2016-02-16
RHSA-2016:0175 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0176CRITICAL2016-02-16
RHSA-2016:0176 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0225CRITICAL2016-02-16
RHSA-2016:0225 — Critical
- Red HatRHSA-2016:0277CRITICAL2016-02-16
RHSA-2016:0277 — Critical
- UbuntuUSN-2900-1HIGH
GNU C Library vulnerability
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 7× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 14:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 09:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 03:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 06:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 13:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 16:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 02:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 28 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-12 11:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-08 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-27 03:05 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-23 17:00 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-16 17:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-15 17:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-06 22:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-31 00:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-27 13:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-22 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-22 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-22 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-20 22:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-18 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Publicly available exploits
(6 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (4 GitHub PoCs) (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- Exploit-DBEDB-39454✓ verifiedFirst seen Feb 16, 2016
glibc - 'getaddrinfo' Stack Buffer Overflow (PoC)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-40339First seen Sep 6, 2016
glibc - 'getaddrinfo' Remote Stack Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCeSentire/cve-2015-7547-publicFirst seen Apr 5, 2016
PoC attack server for CVE-2015-7547 buffer overflow vulnerability in glibc DNS stub resolver (public version)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCjgajek/cve-2015-7547First seen Mar 10, 2016
PoC exploit server for CVE-2015-7547
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCcakuzo/CVE-2015-7547First seen Feb 17, 2016
test script for CVE-2015-7547
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCfjserna/CVE-2015-7547First seen Feb 10, 2016
Proof of concept for CVE-2015-7547
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:8:glibc · Debian:7:eglibc
- CVE-2015-8779EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-8778EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-8776EG 9.1EPSS p92CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-1000366EG 7.8HIGH
- CVE-2015-0235EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2014-9402EG 7.8EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2015-1472EG 7.5EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2014-4043EG 7.5EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2014-5119EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2015-1781EG 6.8EPSS p92MEDIUM
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2015-7547?
When was CVE-2015-7547 disclosed?
Is CVE-2015-7547 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2015-7547?
How do I remediate CVE-2015-7547?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-7547
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-7547?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.