Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST."
CVE-2015-0235
This CVE was only ever scored under CVSS v2.0. NVD CVSS v2.0 base 10.0 — v2 rates that HIGH (v2 bands: LOW 0.0–3.9 / MEDIUM 4.0–6.9 / HIGH 7.0–10.0; v2 has no CRITICAL band). Vector AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C. CVSS v2 is an older, coarser metric than v3.1/v4.0 (no Scope, no User Interaction, no Attack Requirements), so it is not directly comparable to a v3 or v4 score. NVD has never re-scored this record under v3. EPSS predicts 94.9% exploitation probability in the next 30 days, which is reflected in EG Risk but does not lift the v2 base. Confidence: LOW.
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 95%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, Exploit-DB (verified), epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v2.0 (legacy)
- 10.0HIGHNVD never assigned a CVSS v3 rating to this CVE
- EG Score
- 10.0(low)
- EG Risk
- 87(Track)EG Risk 87/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity100% × 45%Exploitation95% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 95%
- EPSS %ILE
- 100%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
January 28, 2015
Last Modified
May 6, 2026
References (180)
- secalert@redhathttp://blogs.sophos.com/2015/01/29/sophos-products-and-the-ghost-vulnerability-affecting-linux/
- secalert@redhathttp://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2015-0090.html
- secalert@redhathttp://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2015-0092.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jun/msg00002.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Oct/msg00005.html
- secalert@redhathttp://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Sep/msg00008.html
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142296726407499&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142721102728110&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142722450701342&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142781412222323&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143145428124857&w=2
- secalert@redhathttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130171/Exim-ESMTP-GHOST-Denial-Of-Service.html
- secalert@redhathttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130768/EMC-Secure-Remote-Services-GHOST-SQL-Injection-Command-Injection.html
- secalert@redhathttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/130974/Exim-GHOST-glibc-gethostbyname-Buffer-Overflow.html
- secalert@redhathttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153278/WAGO-852-Industrial-Managed-Switch-Series-Code-Execution-Hardcoded-Credentials.html
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2015-0235(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2015:0126Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: rhev-hypervisor6 security update
- RHSA-2015:0101Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: glibc security update
- RHSA-2015:0099Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: glibc security update
- RHSA-2015:0092Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: glibc security update
- RHSA-2015:0090Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: glibc security update
Patch Availability(6)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libc6 (2.15-0ubuntu10.10) @ precise | 2026-07-26 | ubuntu |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor6-0:6.6-20150123.1.el6ev | 2015-02-04 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.12-1.132.el6_5.5 | 2015-01-28 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.3.4-2.57.el4.2 | 2015-01-28 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.17-55.el7_0.5 | 2015-01-27 | redhat |
| redhat | glibc-0:2.5-123.el5_11.1 | 2015-01-27 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — | 2.18-1 | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — | 2.18-1 | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — | 2.18-1 | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| glibc | — | 2.18-1 | — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| eglibc | 2.11.2-10 ... 2.11.3-4 (10 versions) | 2.11.3-4+deb6u4 | — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| eglibc | 2.13-38 ... 2.13-38+deb7u6 (7 versions) | 2.13-38+deb7u7 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 4,370 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 01:01 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 13:52 UTCEG score recompute▲ 10.00
- 2026-07-26 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-26 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
Publicly available exploits
(9 references)Working exploit code is in the public domain (2 Metasploit modules) (5 GitHub PoCs) (2 Exploit-DB entries). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.
- GitHub PoCarm13/ghost_exploitFirst seen Mar 28, 2015
CVE-2015-0235 EXIM ESTMP GHOST Glibc Gethostbyname() DoS Exploit/PoC
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-36421✓ verifiedFirst seen Mar 18, 2015
Exim - 'GHOST' glibc gethostbyname Buffer Overflow (Metasploit)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmakelinux/CVE-2015-0235-workaroundFirst seen Feb 2, 2015
A shared library wrapper with additional checks for vulnerable functions gethostbyname2_r gethostbyname_r (GHOST vulnerability)
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-35951First seen Jan 29, 2015
Exim ESMTP 4.80 - glibc gethostbyname Denial of Service
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCmikesplain/CVE-2015-0235-cookbookFirst seen Jan 27, 2015
A chef cookbook to test the GHOST vulnerability
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCaaronfay/CVE-2015-0235-testFirst seen Jan 27, 2015
Ansible playbook to check vulnerability for CVE-2015-0235
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCfser/ghost-checkerFirst seen Jan 27, 2015
Test wether you're exposed to ghost (CVE-2015-0235). All kudos go to Qualys Security
Open source ↗ - Metasploitexploit/linux/smtp/exim_gethostbyname_bof✓ verifiedFirst seen Jan 27, 2015
Exim GHOST (glibc gethostbyname) Buffer Overflow
Open source ↗ - Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/http/wordpress_ghost_scanner✓ verifiedFirst seen Jan 1, 2015
WordPress XMLRPC GHOST Vulnerability Scanner
Open source ↗
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2015-0235?
When was CVE-2015-0235 disclosed?
Is CVE-2015-0235 actively exploited?
How do I remediate CVE-2015-0235?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2015-0235
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2015-0235?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.