An unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability exists in Pandora FMS versions up to and including 5.0RC1 via the Anyterm web interface, which listens on TCP port 8023. The anyterm-module endpoint accepts unsanitized user input via the p parameter and directly injects it into a shell command, allowing arbitrary command execution as the pandora user. In certain versions (notably 4.1 and 5.0RC1), the pandora user can elevate privileges to root without a password using a chain involving the artica user account. This account is typically installed without a password and is configured to run sudo without authentication. Therefore, full system compromise is possible without any credentials.
CVE-2014-125124
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 2.3% (83rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit)
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists Artica ST Pandora FMS versions up to and including 5.0RC1 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 86EG Risk 86/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation65% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 2 (Weaponized): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 2.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 83rd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 2.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-22). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 31, 2025
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 17, 2026Pandora FMS <= 5.0RC1 Anyterm Unauthenticated Command Injection | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/pandora-fms-anyterm-unauth-command-injectionPandora Fms - Remote Code Execution (Metasploit) - Linux remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31518Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 175 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 79 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-23 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-22 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.3% · 83rd percentile
- 2026-10-21 05:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-20 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-19 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-19 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-18 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-18 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-17 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-17 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-16 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-15 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-15 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-14 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-12 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9whg-3jfv-8hgp · GitHub severity CRITICAL
- 2026-10-12 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-12 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-30 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-30 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 80th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.1% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 71st percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 70th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- Metasploitexploit/linux/http/pandora_fms_exec✓ verifiedPublished Feb 6, 2014
Pandora FMS Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-306 · CWE-78
- CVE-2014-125126EG 9.2CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-10039EG 8.7EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2013-10037EG 9.3EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-10050EG 8.8EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2013-10046EG 8.5HIGH
- CVE-2013-10048EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-10049EG 9.3CRITICAL
- CVE-2013-10053EG 8.7HIGH
- CVE-2013-10058EG 8.6EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2013-10059EG 7.2EPSS p98HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2014-125124?
When was CVE-2014-125124 made public?
Is CVE-2014-125124 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-125124?
How do I remediate CVE-2014-125124?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2014-125124
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-125124?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.