OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability.
CVE-2014-0224
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicted 95% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 7.4 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2014-0267 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 95%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 71EG Risk 71/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity74% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation95% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 95%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 7.4 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 95% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
June 5, 2014
Last Modified
May 6, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated May 7, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2014-0224(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2014:0679Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update
- CVE-2014-0224Palo Alto Networks Security AdvisoriesHigh
CVE-2014-0224 OpenSSL Man-in-the-middle vulnerability
- RHSA-2014:0629Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: rhev-hypervisor6 security update
- RHSA-2014:0628Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update
- RHSA-2014:0625Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update
Patch Availability(12)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libssl0.9.8 (0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.18) @ lucid | 2026-10-25 | ubuntu |
| redhat | openssl-1:1.0.1e-34.el7_0.3 | 2014-06-10 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl098e-0:0.9.8e-29.el7_0.2 | 2014-06-10 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14 | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | rhev-hypervisor6-0:6.5-20140603.1.el6ev | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:0.9.8e-27.el5_10.3 | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl098e-0:0.9.8e-18.el6_5.2 | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openssl-0:1.0.0-27.el6_4.4 | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
| redhat | patch | 2014-06-05 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | — |
| — |
Debian:6.0(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 0.9.8o-4 ... 0.9.8o-4squeeze9 (15 versions) |
| — |
Debian:7(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl | 1.0.1e-2 ... 1.0.1e-2+deb7u9 (10 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(9)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0624IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0624 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0626IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0626 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0627IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0627 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0630IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0630 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0631IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0631 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0632IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0632 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0633IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0633 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2014:0680IMPORTANT2014-06-05
RHSA-2014:0680 — Important
- UbuntuUSN-2232-1MEDIUM
OpenSSL vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 90 of 100 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 10 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 10 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-25 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-24 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-23 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-21 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-21 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 21:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-19 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-18 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-18 12:46 UTCVendor advisory
Show 65 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-18 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-18 11:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 09:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 09:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-16 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 07:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-15 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-14 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-13 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-12 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 21:02 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 15:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 15:53 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-23 10:52 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 12:57 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-22 05:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-19 14:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-16 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-05 00:26 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-22 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-21 01:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-16 11:44 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 95% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-14 23:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-10 22:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-07 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-01 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-31 22:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-05-28 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-05-28 18:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-05-28 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84gm-v5wh-659w · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-05-28 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(4 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 GitHub checker repository. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/ssl/openssl_ccs✓ verifiedPublished Jul 22, 2014
OpenSSL Server-Side ChangeCipherSpec Injection Scanner
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCsecretnonempty/CVE-2014-0224Published Jul 16, 2014
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCssllabs/openssl-ccs-cve-2014-0224Published Jul 15, 2014
- GitHub checkerTripwire/OpenSSL-CCS-Inject-TestPublished Jun 12, 2014
This script is designed for detection of vulnerable servers (CVE-2014-0224.) in a wide range of configurations. It attempts to negotiate using each affected protocol version (SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1, and TLSv1.2) advertising a comprehensive set of ciphers.
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:6.0:openssl
- CVE-2015-4000NVD 3.7EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-1789NVD 7.5EG 8.7EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2014-8176EG 7.5EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2015-0292EG 7.5EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2014-3567EG 7.1EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2015-1791EG 6.8EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-0209EG 6.8EPSS p97MEDIUM
- CVE-2014-0195EG 6.8EPSS p100MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-3195NVD 5.3EG 5.9EPSS p99MEDIUM
- CVE-2015-1792EG 5.0EPSS p98MEDIUM
Same vendor
6 shownredhat:RHSA-2014:0625 · redhat:RHSA-2014:0629
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2014-0224?
When was CVE-2014-0224 made public?
Is CVE-2014-0224 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2014-0224?
How do I remediate CVE-2014-0224?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2014-0224
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2014-0224?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.