CVE-2013-2566

CRITICALNVD 5.99.0▲
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score elevated to 9.0 because EPSS predicts 84% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). NVD baseline CVSS 5.9 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.

Triggered by: EPSS exploit prediction ≥85%
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Weaponized
9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch this weekExploitation is likely or a public exploit exists.
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 84%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, epss top5pct, epss high, public exploit)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 84%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: Metasploit · epss top5pct · epss high · public exploitExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext.

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
74
EG Risk 74/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity90% × 45%
Exploitation84% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
84%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

March 15, 2013

Last Modified

May 22, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated May 29, 2026
Patch available.
generic

Mozilla Network Security Service: Multiple vulnerabilities (GLSA 201406-19) — Gentoo security

http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201406-19.xml
generic

The Opera Blog - News | Opera

http://my.opera.com/securitygroup/blog/2013/03/20/on-the-precariousness-of-rc4
generic

'[security bulletin] HPSBGN03324 rev.1 - HP Business Service Automation Essentials Core, Remote Discl' - MARC

http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=143039468003789&w=2
generic

CEC Juniper Community

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705
generic

Attack of the week: RC4 is kind of broken in TLS – A Few Thoughts on Cryptographic Engineering

http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2013/03/attack-of-week-rc4-is-kind-of-broken-in.html

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntufirefox (25.0.1+build1-0ubuntu0.13.10.1) @ saucy2026-05-29ubuntu
ubuntuthunderbird (1:24.1.1+build1-0ubuntu0.13.04.1) @ raring2026-05-29ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 7× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-30 00:10 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-26 15:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-24 13:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 19:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-07 15:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-06 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-05 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-04 13:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-02 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 14:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-26 14:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 07:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 23:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-19 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-16 02:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-15 01:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-12 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-07 16:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-30 01:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-28 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-23 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-23 00:13 UTCEG score recompute▲ 3.10
  24. 2026-07-22 21:51 UTCEG score recompute▼ 3.10
  25. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 38 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-21 15:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-18 10:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 16:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-09 19:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-04 06:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 04:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-23 21:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-18 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-16 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-15 17:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-13 22:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-12 23:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-05 22:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-02 20:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-05-29 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-05-29 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-05-29 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-05-26 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-05-24 16:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-05-22 21:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-05-21 22:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-05-20 11:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-05-18 21:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Working exploit code is in the public domain (1 Metasploit module). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly — public PoCs typically lead to mass-exploitation within 24-72 hours.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/scanner/ssl/ssl_version✓ verified
    First seen Oct 14, 2014

    SSL/TLS Version Detection

    Open source ↗

Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2013-2566?
CVE-2013-2566 is a critical vulnerability published on March 15, 2013. The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext.
When was CVE-2013-2566 disclosed?
CVE-2013-2566 was first published on March 15, 2013, with the most recent update on May 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2013-2566 actively exploited?
CVE-2013-2566 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model classifies it as weaponized: a functional public exploit exists. FIRST EPSS estimates a 84% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2013-2566?
CVE-2013-2566 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.9 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2013-2566?
A fix for CVE-2013-2566 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2013-2566

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2013-2566?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs