RHSA-2026:8509HighCVSS 7.5

Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.0 release and security update

Published
April 16, 2026
Last Modified
August 17, 2026

🔗 CVE IDs covered (6)

📋 Description

CVE-2026-1605 — org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-server: Eclipse Jetty: Denial of Service due to unreleased JDK Inflater from compressed HTTP requests CVE-2026-24281 — Apache ZooKeeper: Apache ZooKeeper: Impersonation of servers or clients via reverse DNS spoofing CVE-2026-24308 — Apache ZooKeeper: Apache ZooKeeper: Information disclosure via improper handling of configuration values CVE-2026-32642 — Apache Artemis: Apache ActiveMQ Artemis: Apache Artemis and Apache ActiveMQ Artemis: Unauthorized address creation due to incorrect authorization during JMS topic subscription. CVE-2026-33870 — io.netty/netty-codec-http: Netty: Request smuggling via incorrect parsing of HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding extension values CVE-2026-33871 — netty: Netty: Denial of Service via HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame flood

🎯 Affected products1

  • Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.0

✅ Remediation

Before applying the update, back up your existing installation, including all applications, configuration files, databases and database settings. The References section of this erratum contains a download link (you must log in to download the update). Workaround: To mitigate this issue, disable reverse DNS lookup in Apache ZooKeeper's client and quorum protocols. This can be achieved by configuring the `zookeeper.ssl.hostnameVerification.disableReverseDns` property to `true`. This configuration option is available in Apache ZooKeeper versions 3.8.6 and 3.9.5 and later. A restart of the ZooKeeper service will be required for the change to take effect. Workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability. Workaround: Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.

🔗 References (36)