Glances: Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-32608: action-template sanitizer is bypassed by nested stat values (process 'cmdline') → OS command injection
🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)
📋 Description
Summary
CVE-2026-32608 ("Command Injection via Process Names in Action Command Templates") was fixed (commit 5680a5d) by adding _sanitize_mustache_dict, which replaces the shell operators &&, |, >>, > with spaces in the values rendered into action command templates.
The sanitizer only processes top-level string values (if isinstance(v, str)). Attacker-controlled nested values — most notably a process's cmdline, which Glances exposes as a list and which is fully attacker-controlled via argv — are passed through unsanitized. Because the Mustache renderer (chevron) does not HTML-escape the pipe character |, a | embedded in such a nested value survives into the rendered command and is then interpreted by secure_popen (which still interprets &&/|/> by default, allow_operators=True), re-introducing the exact command injection the CVE was meant to close.
Details
The fix (glances/actions.py):
_SHELL_OPERATORS = ('&&', '|', '>>', '>') # line 25
def _sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict): # line 28
...
for k, v in mustache_dict.items():
if isinstance(v, str): # line 40 <-- ONLY top-level strings
for op in _SHELL_OPERATORS:
v = v.replace(op, ' ')
safe[k] = v
else:
safe[k] = v # nested list/dict passed VERBATIM
return safe
Render + sink (glances/actions.py:104-111):
safe_dict = _sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict)
cmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, safe_dict) # chevron does NOT escape '|'
...
ret = secure_popen(cmd_full) # secure_popen(cmd, allow_operators=True)
secure_popen (glances/secure.py:17, default allow_operators=True) splits the command by &&, then __secure_popen interprets | (pipe to a new process) and > (write output to a file). A surviving | therefore launches an attacker-named second process.
The attacker-controlled nested value — cmdline. The action mustache_dict is the per-item plugin stat (glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:931 mustache_dict = item, then :943 self.actions.run(..., mustache_dict=mustache_dict)). For the processlist plugin, each item contains cmdline, a list of the process arguments, set by the attacker simply by launching a process with chosen argv. The sanitizer's isinstance(v, str) test skips the list, so its elements reach chevron.render unmodified.
Why the operator survives render. chevron/Mustache HTML-escapes & < > " ' for {{var}} (so > and && are neutralized) but does not escape |. A pipe in the (unsanitized) nested value therefore reaches secure_popen intact and is interpreted.
Parent-fix attribution (verified against the real diff of commit 5680a5d / CVE-2026-32608): that fix added exactly _SHELL_OPERATORS, _sanitize_mustache_dict, and the _sanitize_mustache_dict(mustache_dict) call — and the sanitizer's docstring explicitly claims to neutralize "user-controllable data (process names, container names, mount points, etc.)". It does so only for top-level strings; the list/dict case (else: safe[k] = v) was left unsanitized. This is therefore a genuine incomplete-fix gap, not a re-report of the patched (top-level string) vector.
Proof of Concept
Lab-only, harmless (touches a marker file; non-destructive). Runs the real glances chain (_sanitize_mustache_dict → chevron.render → secure_popen) — see poc/glances_nested_mustache_poc.py.
Attacker process argv (the only attacker input): cmdline = ['x', '|touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker', '#'].
Admin action template (renders the offending process's cmdline): echo ALERT {{#cmdline}}{{.}} {{/cmdline}}.
Observed (confirmed on develop HEAD 92156d0/4.5.6 and verified code-identical on v4.5.5):
cmdline after sanitizer : ['x', '|touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker', '#'] <- pipe survives
cmd_full -> secure_popen : 'echo ALERT x |touch /tmp/glances_poc_marker # '
[VULNERABLE] marker created -> /tmp/glances_poc_marker (command injection executed)
Replacing touch /tmp/... with any command yields arbitrary execution in the Glances process context.
Preconditions (stated honestly)
- A configured alert action whose command template renders a nested stat field (e.g. the process
cmdlinevia a{{#cmdline}}…{{/cmdline}}section). Templates that render only flat string fields ({{name}},{{value}},{{username}},{{mnt_point}}) are not affected — those values are sanitized. - Glances running with privilege to enumerate the attacker's process (typically root in server/agent monitoring deployments) → privilege boundary crossed (
S:C).
Impact
A local unprivileged user gains OS command execution in the Glances security context (commonly root) — the same impact and threat model as the parent CVE-2026-32608, re-enabled for any action template that renders a nested stat field. The injection is reliable once the (admin-set) template references such a field.
Suggested fix
- Sanitize recursively — apply the operator stripping to strings inside lists and dicts, not only top-level
strvalues. - And/or build the templated action as an argument list and run it via
secure_popen(..., allow_operators=False)/shell=Falsewithout operator interpretation. - And/or also strip the pipe
|(and treat all_SHELL_OPERATORS) on every rendered string regardless of nesting; do not rely on Mustache HTML-escaping (it does not escape|).
Credit
Ta Duc Thien
🎯 Affected products1
- pip/glances:>= 4.5.2, < 4.5.6